Target Corp. et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 80

SEALING ORDER WITH SIGNATURE(3510) (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice)
Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202-628-5116
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806)
Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214)
Nathanial J. Wood (CA Bar No. 223547)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
515 South Flower St., 40th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213-622-2690
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Plaintiffs Target Corporation; Sears,
Roebuck and Co.; Kmart Corporation; Old Comp
Inc.; Good Guys, Inc.; RadioShack Corporation;
and Newegg Inc.

14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

18
In re TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST
LITIGATION

Master Docket No. 07-m-1827 SI
Case No. CV:10-4945 SI

This Document Relates To:

19

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EX
PARTE APPLICATION TO FILE
DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

20
21
22

Target Corporation, et al. v. AU Optronics
Corporation, et al., Case No. CV:10-4945 SI

[Civil Local Rule 79-5]
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEYS AT LAW

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE
APPLICATION TO FILE UNDER SEAL;
CASE NO. CV 10-4945 SI

1

Having considered the application regarding whether certain documents Plaintiffs Target

2

Corporation; Sears, Roebuck and Co.; Kmart Corporation; Old Comp Inc.; Good Guys, Inc.;

3

RadioShack Corporation; and Newegg Inc. (“Plaintiffs”) lodged with the Court should be filed

4

under seal pursuant to Civil Local Rules 79-5(d) and 7-10 and the Court’s Standing Order, and

5

good cause appearing, the application is hereby GRANTED.

6

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

7

Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint has been redacted and publicly filed. The

8

redacted portions of the Second Amended Complaint shall remain under seal.

9

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to maintain the effect of the seal under Civil Local

10

Rule 79-5, the parties, their counsel, and their declarants shall not publicly disseminate or discuss

11

any of the sealed documents or their contents absent further order of the Court.

12
13
14

9/9/11
Dated:_________________________

15

___________________________
Susan Illston
United States District Judge

16
17
DCACTIVE-16086022.1

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEYS AT LAW

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE
APPLICATION TO FILE UNDER SEAL;
CASE NO. CV 10-4945 SI