Target Corp. et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 80

SEALING ORDER WITH SIGNATURE(3510) (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice) Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice) CROWELL & MORING LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 Telephone: 202-624-2500 Facsimile: 202-628-5116 Email: jhoward@crowell.com jmurphy@crowell.com Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806) Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214) Nathanial J. Wood (CA Bar No. 223547) CROWELL & MORING LLP 515 South Flower St., 40th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: 213-622-4750 Facsimile: 213-622-2690 Email: jmurray@crowell.com jstokes@crowell.com nwood@crowell.com Counsel for Plaintiffs Target Corporation; Sears, Roebuck and Co.; Kmart Corporation; Old Comp Inc.; Good Guys, Inc.; RadioShack Corporation; and Newegg Inc. 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 18 In re TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION Master Docket No. 07-m-1827 SI Case No. CV:10-4945 SI This Document Relates To: 19 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 20 21 22 Target Corporation, et al. v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., Case No. CV:10-4945 SI [Civil Local Rule 79-5] 23 24 25 26 27 28 C ROWELL & M ORING LLP ATTO RNEYS AT LAW [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION TO FILE UNDER SEAL; CASE NO. CV 10-4945 SI 1 Having considered the application regarding whether certain documents Plaintiffs Target 2 Corporation; Sears, Roebuck and Co.; Kmart Corporation; Old Comp Inc.; Good Guys, Inc.; 3 RadioShack Corporation; and Newegg Inc. (“Plaintiffs”) lodged with the Court should be filed 4 under seal pursuant to Civil Local Rules 79-5(d) and 7-10 and the Court’s Standing Order, and 5 good cause appearing, the application is hereby GRANTED. 6 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 7 Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint has been redacted and publicly filed. The 8 redacted portions of the Second Amended Complaint shall remain under seal. 9 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to maintain the effect of the seal under Civil Local 10 Rule 79-5, the parties, their counsel, and their declarants shall not publicly disseminate or discuss 11 any of the sealed documents or their contents absent further order of the Court. 12 13 14 9/9/11 Dated:_________________________ 15 ___________________________ Susan Illston United States District Judge 16 17 DCACTIVE-16086022.1 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C ROWELL & M ORING LLP ATTO RNEYS AT LAW [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION TO FILE UNDER SEAL; CASE NO. CV 10-4945 SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?