Target Corp. et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 99

ORDER Re Extension of Time To Respond To Second Amended Complaint, Waiver of Service, and [Proposed] Order by Good Guys, Inc., Kmart Corp, Newegg Inc., Old Comp Inc., Radioshack Corp., Sears, Roebuck and Co., Target Corp.. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice)
Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202-628-5116
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806)
Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
515 South Flower St., 40th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213-622-2690
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Plaintiffs Target Corporation; Sears,
Roebuck and Co.; Kmart Corporation; Old Comp
Inc.; Good Guys, Inc.; RadioShack Corporation;
and Newegg Inc.
[Additional counsel listed on signature page]

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
In re TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST
LITIGATION

Master Docket No. 07-m-1827 SI
Case No. CV:10-4945 SI

This Document Relates To:

18

STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF
TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT, WAIVER
OF SERVICE, AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER

19
20
21

Target Corporation, et al. v. AU Optronics
Corporation, et al., Case No. CV:10-4945 SI

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

CASE NO. CV:10-4945 SI

1

Whereas, plaintiffs Target Corporation; Sears, Roebuck and Co.; Kmart Corporation; Old

2

Comp Inc.; Good Guys, Inc.; RadioShack Corporation; and Newegg Inc. (“Plaintiffs”) filed a

3

second amended complaint (“SAC”) in the above-captioned case adding as defendants Philips

4

Electronics North America Corporation, Samsung SDI Co. Ltd., Samsung SDI America, Inc., and

5

Sanyo Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd. (the “Newly Named Defendants”) on September 9, 2011;

6
7

Whereas, Plaintiffs wish to avoid the burden and expense of serving process on the Newly
Named Defendants;

8
9

Whereas, the Newly Named Defendants wish to confirm a date certain for their time to
respond to the SAC; and

10
11

Whereas the parties wish to set a briefing schedule if the Newly Named Defendants elect
to file motions to dismiss the SAC.

12

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the

13

undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, Plaintiffs, on the one hand, and the

14

Newly Named Defendants, on the other hand, as follows:

15

1.

The Newly Named Defendants waive service of the SAC under Federal Rule of

16

Civil Procedure 4(d). This stipulation does not constitute a waiver by the Newly Named

17

Defendants of any other substantive or procedural defense, including but not limited to the

18

defenses of lack of personal or subject matter jurisdiction and improper venue.

19

2.

The deadline for the Newly Named Defendants to move to dismiss, answer, or

20

otherwise respond to the SAC will be November 18, 2011.

21

///

22

///

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///

C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

-1STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

CASE NO. CV:10-4945 SI

1
2

3.

If the Newly Named Defendants file motions to dismiss the SAC, any such

motions shall be heard on the following schedule:

3

Oppositions to be filed by:

December 14, 2011

4

Replies to be filed by:

December 23, 2011

5

Hearing Date:

January 6, 2012

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Dated: October 18, 2011
/s/ Nathanial J. Wood
Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806)
Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214)
Nathanial J. Wood (CA Bar No. 223547)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
515 South Flower St., 40th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213-622-2690
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice)
Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202-628-5116
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Kenneth L. Adams (pro hac vice)
R. Bruce Holcomb (pro hac vice)
Christopher T. Leonardo (pro hac vice)
ADAMS HOLCOMB LLP
1875 Eye Street NW
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202-580-8821
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

25
26
27

Counsel for Plaintiffs Target Corporation; Sears,
Roebuck and Co.; Kmart Corporation; Old Comp
Inc.; Good Guys, Inc.; RadioShack Corporation;
and Newegg Inc.

28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

-2STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

CASE NO. CV:10-4945 SI

1
/s/ Eric S. O’Connor
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Michael W. Scarborough (SBN 203524)
Tyler Mark Cunningham (SBN 243694)
SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON
Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Eric S. O’Connor (SBN 223244)
SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON
30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, New York 10112-0015
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 212-653-8701
[e-mail]
Counsel for Defendants Samsung SDI America, Inc.
and Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.

14
15

/s/ Brendan P. Cullen

16

Brendan P. Cullen (SBN 194057)
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
1870 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, California 94303
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Garrard R. Beeney (NY Reg. No. 1656172)
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
125 Broad Street
New York, New York 10004-2498
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Defendant Philips Electronics North
America Corporation

26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

-3STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

CASE NO. CV:10-4945 SI

1
2

/s/ Allison A. Davis

3

Allison A. Davis (SBN 139203)
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

4
5
6
7

Nick S. Verwolf (admitted pro hac vice)
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
777 108th Avenue, N.E.
Bellevue, WA 98004-5149
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

8
9
10
11
12

Counsel for Defendant Sanyo Consumer Electronics
Co., Ltd.

13
14
15
16
17
18

Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the
filing of this document has been obtained from Eric S. O’Connor, Brendan P. Cullen and
Allison A. Davis.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

19
20

10/24
Dated: ________________, 2011

21
22
Susan Illston, United States District Judge

23
24

DCACTIVE-16334353.1

25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

-4STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

CASE NO. CV:10-4945 SI