Arevalo et al v. Bank of America Corporation

Filing 43

STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Time for Defendants to Respond to Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 05/11/2011. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2011)

1 Patrick S. Thompson (SBN 160804)
[e-mail]
2 Michael J. Moloney III (SBN 259140)
[e-mail]
3 GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, 24th Floor
4 San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel.: [phone]
5 Fax: [phone]
6 David L. Permut (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
7 Eric I. Goldberg (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
8 GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
901 New York Avenue NW
9 Washington, DC 20001
Tel.: [phone]
10 Fax: [phone]
11 Attorneys for Defendants
12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

16
17 JUAN AREVALO, MITCHELL SANDOW,
and ANGELA ZELENY, individually and on
18 behalf of all others similarly situated,
19
20

Plaintiffs,

Case No. 10-CV-04959-TEH
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

v.

21 BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION and
FIA CARD SERVICES, N.A.,
22
Defendants.
23

Second Amended Complaint Filed: April 29,
2011
Judge: Hon. Thelton E. Henderson

24
25
26
27
28
LIBA/2178111.1

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT
Case No. 10-CV-04959-TEH

1

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT

2
3

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiffs Juan

4 Arevalo, Mitchell Sandow and Angela Zeleny (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants Bank of America
5 Corporation and FIA Card Services, N.A., (“Defendants”) (together, with Plaintiffs, the “Parties”),
6 through their undersigned counsel, stipulate as follows:
7

WHEREAS, on April 29, 2011, Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. No.

8 40) in this action;
9

WHEREAS, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 and 12, Defendants’ responsive pleading to the

10 Second Amended Complaint would be due on or before May 13, 2011;
11

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed that Defendants shall have an extension of time to file

12 their responsive pleading;
13

WHEREAS, the stipulated extension does not affect any proceeding on the court’s

14 calendar; and
15

WHEREAS, this Stipulation is without prejudice to, or waiver of, any rights of defenses

16 otherwise available to the Parties in this action.
17

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, between Plaintiffs,

18 by their undersigned counsel, and Defendants, by their undersigned counsel, that Defendants shall
19 have through and including May 27, 2011 to answer or otherwise respond to the Second Amended
20 Complaint.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LIBA/2178111.1

-2-

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT
Case No. 10-CV-04959-TEH

1 Dated: May 10, 2011

Respectfully submitted,

2
By:

3
4
5
6
7
8

/s/ Michael J. Moloney III
Patrick S. Thompson
[e-mail]
Michael J. Moloney III
[e-mail]
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, 24th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
David L. Permut (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Eric I. Goldberg (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
901 New York Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

9
10
11
12
13

Attorneys for Defendants

14
15

By:

16
17

S
NO

21

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

n

so
Hender

R NIA

20

UNIT
ED

19

RT
U
O

18

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA 05/11/2011

/s/ Allison S. Elgart
Michael W. Sobol
[e-mail]
Allison Stacy Elgart
[e-mail]
LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN &
BERNSTEIN, LLP
275 Battery Street, 30th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel.: [phone] x2232
Fax: [phone]

27

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

24

A

H

ER

LI

Ju

RT

23

FO

26

Wendy R. Fleishman
[e-mail]
Rachel Geman
[e-mail]
LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN &
BERNSTEIN, LLP
250 Hudson Street, 8th Floor
New York, NY 10013-1413
Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

22

lton E.
dge The

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

25

28
LIBA/2178111.1

-3-

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT
Case No. 10-CV-04959-TEH