Arevalo et al v. Bank of America Corporation

Filing 5

ORDER granting re 4 Stipulation Extending Time For Defendant Bank of America Corporation To Respond To Compliant filed by Bank of America Corporation. Signed by Judge James Larson on 12/1/10. (fj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2010)

Arevalo et al v. Bank of America Corporation

Doc. 5

1 Patrick S. Thompson (SBN 160804) [e-mail] 2 Michael J. Moloney III (SBN 259140) [e-mail] 3 GOODWIN PROCTER LLP Three Embarcadero Center, 24th Floor 4 San Francisco, California 94111 Tel.: [phone] Fax: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant 7 Bank of America Corporation 8 9 10 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION Case No. 10-CV-4959 JL CLASS ACTION ORDER STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Complaint Filed: Before: November 2, 2010 Magistrate James Larson

JUAN AREVALO and MITCHELL 13 SANDOW, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 14 Plaintiffs, 15 v. 16 BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
LIBA/2134305.1

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case No. 10-CV-4959 JL Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiffs Juan

4 Arevalo and Mitchell Sandow ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Bank of America Corporation 5 ("BAC") ("Defendant") (together, with Plaintiffs, the "Parties"), through their undersigned 6 counsel, stipulate as follows: 7 8 WHEREAS, on November 2, 2010, Plaintiffs filed a complaint in this action; WHEREAS, the Complaint purports to assert a number of putative class claims against

9 Defendant; 10 11 2010; 12 WHEREAS, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 and 12, Defendant's responsive pleadings to the WHEREAS, Plaintiffs served the Complaint upon Defendant on or about November 4,

13 Complaint would be due on or before November 29, 2010; 14 WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed that Defendant shall have an extension of time to file

15 its responsive pleading; 16 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs may file an amended complaint prior to the filing of Defendant's

17 responsive pleading to seek damages in connection with their claims under the Consumers Legal 18 Remedies Act; 19 WHEREAS, the Parties agree that Defendant shall file a pleading responsive to the

20 complaint and the anticipated amendment thereto; 21 WHEREAS, the stipulated extension does not affect any proceeding on the court's

22 calendar; and 23 WHEREAS, this Stipulation is without prejudice to, or waiver of, any rights or defenses

24 otherwise available to the Parties in this action; 25 26 27 28
LIBA/2134305.1

1

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case No. 10-CV-4959 JL

DATED: 12/1/10

UNIT ED

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

A

C

LI

FO

Judge Ja

mes Lar

son

R NIA

O OR IT IS S

DERED

RT U O

NO

RT
H

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
LIBA/2134305.1

PROOF OF SERVICE I further certify that this document filed through the ECF system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as non registered participants on this 24th day of November, 2010. /s/ Patrick S. Thompson Patrick S. Thompson

3

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case No. 10-CV-4959 JL