Bridgewater v. Tonna et al

Filing 123

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT, TO RE-OPEN CASE, FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; DENYING APPLICATIONS FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND TO SHORTEN TIME. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 24, 2011. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/24/2011: # 1 Certificate of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 SHARON BRIDGEWATER, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 No. C-10-4966 MMC v. ROGER TONNA, et al., Defendants. / 16 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT, TO RE-OPEN CASE, FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; DENYING APPLICATIONS FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND TO SHORTEN TIME 17 18 Before the Court is plaintiff Sharon Bridgewater’s “Ex Parte Motion [for] Relief from 19 Judgment(s),” filed October 12, 2011, and plaintiff’s “Ex Parte Motion to Re-open Case,” 20 filed October 12, 2011. 21 The instant filings represent, respectively, plaintiff’s fourth and fifth attempts to set 22 aside the judgment entered March 30, 2011. Having read and considered plaintiff’s 23 motions for relief from the judgment and to reopen the case, the Court hereby DENIES said 24 motions for the reason plaintiff, again, fails to show any cognizable basis exists for 25 reconsideration of the judgment entered March 30, 2011. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). 26 Further, in light of the denial of the motions for relief from the judgment and to 27 reopen the case, plaintiff’s “Ex Parte Motion with Leave to File a First Amended Complaint,” 28 filed October 12, 2011 and amended October 13, 2011, “Ex Parte Motion for Summary 1 Adjudication of Issues,” filed October 12, 2011, “Ex Parte Application Temporary 2 Restraining Order with Asset Freeze,” filed October 12, 2011, and “Ex Parte Application for 3 Order Shortening Time,” filed October 12, 2011, are hereby DENIED as moot. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: October 24, 2011 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?