Bridgewater v. Tonna et al

Filing 75

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS TO RECONSIDER AND FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT; DENYING APPLICATIONS FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND TO SHORTEN TIME. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 28, 2011. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 SHARON BRIDGEWATER, Plaintiff, 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 No. C-10-4966 MMC ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS TO RECONSIDER AND FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT; DENYING APPLICATIONS FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND TO SHORTEN TIME v. ROGER TONNA, et al., Defendants. 12 / 13 14 Before the Court is plaintiff Sharon Bridgewater’s “Motion to Reconsider, Vacate 15 Judgment of Dismissal, Alter and Amend Judgment,” filed April 27, 2011. Having read and 16 considered plaintiff’s motion to reconsider, the Court hereby DENIES said motion for the 17 reason plaintiff fails to show any cognizable basis for reconsideration exists. See Fed. R. 18 Civ. P. 60(b). 19 Further, in light of the denial of the motion to reconsider, plaintiff’s “Motion with 20 Leave to File a First Amended Complaint,” filed April 27, 2011, “Ex Parte Application 21 Temporary Restraining Order with Appointment of Temporary Receiver,” filed April 27, 22 2011, and “Ex Parte Application for Order Shortening Time,” filed April 27, 2011, are hereby 23 DENIED as moot. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: April 28, 2011 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?