Bridgewater v. Tonna et al
Filing
75
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS TO RECONSIDER AND FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT; DENYING APPLICATIONS FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND TO SHORTEN TIME. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 28, 2011. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
SHARON BRIDGEWATER,
Plaintiff,
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
No. C-10-4966 MMC
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTIONS TO RECONSIDER AND FOR
LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED
COMPLAINT; DENYING APPLICATIONS
FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING
ORDER AND TO SHORTEN TIME
v.
ROGER TONNA, et al.,
Defendants.
12
/
13
14
Before the Court is plaintiff Sharon Bridgewater’s “Motion to Reconsider, Vacate
15
Judgment of Dismissal, Alter and Amend Judgment,” filed April 27, 2011. Having read and
16
considered plaintiff’s motion to reconsider, the Court hereby DENIES said motion for the
17
reason plaintiff fails to show any cognizable basis for reconsideration exists. See Fed. R.
18
Civ. P. 60(b).
19
Further, in light of the denial of the motion to reconsider, plaintiff’s “Motion with
20
Leave to File a First Amended Complaint,” filed April 27, 2011, “Ex Parte Application
21
Temporary Restraining Order with Appointment of Temporary Receiver,” filed April 27,
22
2011, and “Ex Parte Application for Order Shortening Time,” filed April 27, 2011, are hereby
23
DENIED as moot.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated: April 28, 2011
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?