Elpida Memory, Inc. et al v. On Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filing 15

ORDER extending time to respond to complaint re 14 Stipulation, filed by On Semiconductor Corporation, Semiconductor Components Industries, L.L.C.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 12/3/2010. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

PERKINS COIE LLP Michael A. Oblon (pro hac vice to follow) Email: [e-mail] 607 14th Street NW, Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 20005 [phone] [phone] (facsimile) Jerry A. Riedinger (pro hac vice to follow) Email: [e-mail] Vincent Ajay Singh (pro hac vice to follow) Email: [e-mail] 1201 Third Ave., 48th Floor Seattle, WA 98101 [phone] [phone] (facsimile) Euphemia N. Thomopulos, SBN 262107 [e-mail] PERKINS COIE LLP Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400 San Francisco, CA 94111-4131 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Counsel for Defendants On Semiconductor Corp., a Delaware corporation, and Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ELPIDA MEMORY, INC. and ELPIDA MEMORY (USA) INC., Plaintiffs, v. ON SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION and SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS INDUSTRIES, L.L.C., Defendants.
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CASE NO. CV 10-05014 CRB

Case No. CV 10-05014 CRB STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS ON SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION AND SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS INDUSTRIES, L.L.C. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, by and between Plaintiffs Elpida Memory, Inc. and Elpida Memory (USA) Inc. and Defendants On Semiconductor Corp. and Semiconductor Components Industries LLC that Defendants shall have until January 7, 2011, to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint. Defendants requested the extension because they require additional time to evaluate the asserted patent. The deadline for Defendants to answer, move, or otherwise respond is currently December 7, 2010. This stipulation extends Defendants' time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the initial complaint in this action by one month and does not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order. DATED: December 2, 2010 PERKINS COIE LLP By: /s/ Euphemia N. Thomopulos Euphemia N. Thomopulos Attorney for Defendants On Semiconductor Corp. and Semiconductor Components Industries LLC SIMPSON THACHER &BARLETT LLP By: /s/_Patrick E. King__________________ Patrick E. King
2250 Hanover Street Palo Alto, CA 94304 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Email: [e-mail]

Attorney for Plaintiffs Elpida Memory, Inc. and Elpida Memory (USA) Inc.

2 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CASE NO. CV 10-05014 CRB

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 Pursuant to General Order 45X.B, I, Euphemia N. Thomopulos, attest that the above signatories for the Defendants have concurred and consented to the filing of this document. DATED: December 2, 2010 /s/ Euphemia N. Thomopulos Euphemia N. Thomopulos PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS ORDERED THAT Stipulation Extending Time For Defendant On Semiconductor Corporation and Semiconductor Components Industries, L.L.C. To Respond To Complaint is GRANTED. Dated: _____________ Dec. 3, 2010

UNIT ED

S CT ________________________________ TE C TA Honorable Charles R. Breyer U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

DISTRI

RT U O

S

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

3 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CASE NO. CV 10-05014 CRB

A

C

LI

FO

harle Judge C

s R. Bre

yer

R NIA

I

ORD T IS SO

ERED

NO

RT

H