Tria Beauty, Inc. v. Radiancy, Inc
Filing
103
ORDER RELIEVING KRISTIN H. NEUMAN AS COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR DEFENDANT AND COUNTERCLAIM-PLAINTIFF RADIANCY, INC. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/23/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2012)
*E-Filed 2/23/12*
1 Brendan J. O’Rourke*
borourke@proskauer.com
2 Alexander Kaplan*
akaplan@proskauer.com
3 Jennifer L. Jones*
jljones@proskauer.com
4 Victoria L. Loughery*
vloughery@proskauer.com
5 PROSKAUER ROSE LLP
Eleven Times Square
6 New York, NY 10036
Phone: (212) 969-3000
7 Facsimile: (212) 969-2900
8
* Admitted Pro Hac Vice
Robert H. Horn (SBN 134710)
9 rhorn@proskauer.com
PROSKAUER ROSE LLP
10 2049 Century Park East, 32nd Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3206
(310) 557-2900
Facsimile: (310) 557-2193
11 Phone:
12
Attorneys For Defendant and
13 Counterclaim Plaintiff Radiancy, Inc.
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17 TRIA BEAUTY, INC.,
Plaintiff,
18
19
vs.
20 RADIANCY, INC.,
Defendant.
21
22
23
24
CASE NO. CV-10-5030 (RS) (NJV)
[PROPOSED] ORDER RELIEVING
KRISTIN H. NEUMAN AS COUNSEL
OF RECORD FOR DEFENDANT AND
COUNTERCLAIM-PLAINTIFF
RADIANCY, INC.
RADIANCY, INC.,
Counterclaim Plaintiff,
vs.
25 TRIA BEAUTY, INC.,
26
Counterclaim Defendant,
27
and
28 KIMBERLY KARDASHIAN,
Counterclaim Defendant.
ORDER RELIEVING KRISTIN H. NEUMAN AS COUNSEL
No. 10-CV-5030 RS (NJV)
1
Pursuant to the Notice of Withdrawal as Counsel filed by defendant and counterclaim
2 plaintiff Radiancy, Inc., and good cause having been shown,
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Kristin H. Neuman is relieved as counsel of record for
4 defendant and counterclaim plaintiff Radiancy, Inc. in this case.
5
6
7
8
2/23/12
Dated: __________________________
_______________________________________
Richard Seeborg
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER RELIEVING KRISTIN H. NEUMAN AS COUNSEL
.No. 10-CV-5030 RS (NJV)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?