Tria Beauty, Inc. v. Radiancy, Inc

Filing 103

ORDER RELIEVING KRISTIN H. NEUMAN AS COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR DEFENDANT AND COUNTERCLAIM-PLAINTIFF RADIANCY, INC. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/23/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2012)

Download PDF
*E-Filed 2/23/12* 1 Brendan J. O’Rourke* borourke@proskauer.com 2 Alexander Kaplan* akaplan@proskauer.com 3 Jennifer L. Jones* jljones@proskauer.com 4 Victoria L. Loughery* vloughery@proskauer.com 5 PROSKAUER ROSE LLP Eleven Times Square 6 New York, NY 10036 Phone: (212) 969-3000 7 Facsimile: (212) 969-2900 8 * Admitted Pro Hac Vice Robert H. Horn (SBN 134710) 9 rhorn@proskauer.com PROSKAUER ROSE LLP 10 2049 Century Park East, 32nd Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067-3206 (310) 557-2900 Facsimile: (310) 557-2193 11 Phone: 12 Attorneys For Defendant and 13 Counterclaim Plaintiff Radiancy, Inc. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 TRIA BEAUTY, INC., Plaintiff, 18 19 vs. 20 RADIANCY, INC., Defendant. 21 22 23 24 CASE NO. CV-10-5030 (RS) (NJV) [PROPOSED] ORDER RELIEVING KRISTIN H. NEUMAN AS COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR DEFENDANT AND COUNTERCLAIM-PLAINTIFF RADIANCY, INC. RADIANCY, INC., Counterclaim Plaintiff, vs. 25 TRIA BEAUTY, INC., 26 Counterclaim Defendant, 27 and 28 KIMBERLY KARDASHIAN, Counterclaim Defendant. ORDER RELIEVING KRISTIN H. NEUMAN AS COUNSEL No. 10-CV-5030 RS (NJV) 1 Pursuant to the Notice of Withdrawal as Counsel filed by defendant and counterclaim 2 plaintiff Radiancy, Inc., and good cause having been shown, 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Kristin H. Neuman is relieved as counsel of record for 4 defendant and counterclaim plaintiff Radiancy, Inc. in this case. 5 6 7 8 2/23/12 Dated: __________________________ _______________________________________ Richard Seeborg United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER RELIEVING KRISTIN H. NEUMAN AS COUNSEL .No. 10-CV-5030 RS (NJV)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?