Yates v. 22nd & York, LLC et al
Filing
28
ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE OF HEARING 27 . Status Report due by 12/15/2014. Case Management Conference set for 12/22/2014 01:00 PM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 9/23/2014. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2014)
1
4
TIMOTHY S. THIMESCH, ESQ., No. 148213
tim@thimeschlaw.com
158 Hilltop Crescent
Walnut Creek, CA 94597-3452
Tel: 925/588-0401
Fax: 888/210-8868
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff CRAIG YATES
6
ROBERT F. KANE, ESQ., No. 71407
rkane1089@aol.com
LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT F. KANE
870 Market Street, Suite 1128
San Francisco, CA 94102
(415) 982-1510
(415) 982-5821 (fax)
2
3
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Attorneys for Defendants 22ND & YORK
LLC & HANI KAILEH
LAWRENCE FASANO, JR., ESQ., #80017
lfasano130@aol.com
FASANO LAW OFFICE
720 Market Street, Penthouse Suite
San Francisco, CA 94102-2500
Tel: (415) 956-8800
Fax: (415) 956-8811
Attorneys for Defendant OLAVO
DOURADO dba Mr. Pizza Man
17
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
20
CRAIG YATES,
21
CASE NO. 3:10-cv-05041-JL
Civil Rights
Plaintiff,
22
v.
23
22ND & YORK LLC; MR. PIZZA MAN;
OLAVO DOURADO; HANI KAILEH; and
DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive,
/
24
25
Defendants.
26
27
28
─1─
(PROPOSED)
ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE
OF HEARING ON ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE
1
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause having been shown, it is
2
hereby ordered that the hearing on the order to show cause is continued from September 24,
3
December 22
2014 to _________________________, 2014., at 1:00 PM. Joint status report due December 15.
4
__________________________________
S DISTRICT
TE COURT JUDGE
DISTRICT
C
A
S
UNIT
ED
T
7
8
TED
GRAN
9
NO
ER
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
─2─
M. Cousin
s
A
H
11
thanael
Judge Na
LI
RT
10
RT
U
O
6
R NIA
23
Dated: September __, 2014
FO
5
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?