Doe v. Penzato et al

Filing 73

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO LIFT STAY 65 : SETTING BRIEFING DEADLINES. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 11/1/2013. (mejlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 Northern District of California 6 7 JANE DOE, No. C 10-05154 MEJ Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO LIFT STAY [Dkt. No. 65] GIUSEPPE PENZATO, et al., 10 Defendants. _____________________________________/ 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 13 On July 22, 2011, the Court entered a stay in this matter pending the resolution of a criminal 14 proceeding initiated against Defendants pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1595(b). Dkt. No. 56. 15 On October 2, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Lift Stay, indicating that a judgment was 16 entered in the criminal proceeding on May 23, 2013, and the criminal action has now been 17 terminated. Dkt. No. 65. Plaintiff therefore requests that the Court lift the stay. Plaintiff also 18 indicated that she has met and conferred with Defendants and Defendants oppose the Motion. Id. at 19 2. To date, Defendants have not filed an opposition. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS as follows: 20 Defendants shall have until November 8, 2013, to file an response to Plaintiff’s Motion. If 21 Defendants file an opposition, Plaintiff shall have until November 15, 2013, to file a reply; if 22 Defendants fail to respond, Plaintiff shall file a notice of no-opposition by November 15, 2013. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: November 1, 2013 26 27 28 _______________________________ Maria-Elena James United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?