Doe v. Penzato et al

Filing 73

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO LIFT STAY 65 : SETTING BRIEFING DEADLINES. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 11/1/2013. (mejlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2013)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

Northern District of California

6
7

JANE DOE,

No. C 10-05154 MEJ
Plaintiff,

8
v.
9

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO LIFT STAY
[Dkt. No. 65]

GIUSEPPE PENZATO, et al.,
10
Defendants.
_____________________________________/

12
For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

13

On July 22, 2011, the Court entered a stay in this matter pending the resolution of a criminal

14 proceeding initiated against Defendants pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1595(b). Dkt. No. 56.
15

On October 2, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Lift Stay, indicating that a judgment was

16 entered in the criminal proceeding on May 23, 2013, and the criminal action has now been
17 terminated. Dkt. No. 65. Plaintiff therefore requests that the Court lift the stay. Plaintiff also
18 indicated that she has met and conferred with Defendants and Defendants oppose the Motion. Id. at
19 2. To date, Defendants have not filed an opposition. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS as follows:
20 Defendants shall have until November 8, 2013, to file an response to Plaintiff’s Motion. If
21 Defendants file an opposition, Plaintiff shall have until November 15, 2013, to file a reply; if
22 Defendants fail to respond, Plaintiff shall file a notice of no-opposition by November 15, 2013.
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25 Dated: November 1, 2013
26
27
28

_______________________________
Maria-Elena James
United States Magistrate Judge