Integrated Device Technology, Inc. v. Phison Electronics Corp.

Filing 32

STIPULATION AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/2/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2011)

*E-Filed 8/2/11*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

MARK E. MILLER (S.B. #130200) ([e-mail])
DAVID S. ALMELING (S.B. #235449) ([e-mail])
SARA E. JERUSS (S.B. #258716) ([e-mail])
ALEXANDER B. PARKER (S.B. #264705) ([e-mail])
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
INTEGRATED DEVICE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
David M. Barkan (CSB No. 160825/[e-mail])
Robert J. Kent (CSB No. 250905/[e-mail])
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
500 Arguello Street, Suite 500
Redwood City, CA 94063
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
PHISON ELECTRONICS CORP.

13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
18

INTEGRATED DEVICE
TECHNOLOGY, INC.,

19
20
21

Plaintiff,

Case No. CV-10-5168-RS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER

v.
PHISON ELECTRONICS CORP.,

22
Defendant.
23
24
25
26
27
28

WHEREAS the deadline for the parties to exchange proposed terms for construction in
accordance with Patent L.R. 4-1(b) is currently set for August 3, 2011;
WHEREAS the deadline for the parties to exchange preliminary claim constructions and
extrinsic evidence is currently set for August 24, 2011;
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. CV-10-5168-RS

1

WHEREAS the parties have exchanged drafts of a settlement agreement;

2

WHEREAS the parties need additional time to finalize their settlement agreement and file

3
4

the requisite documents with the Court; and
THEREFORE, the parties hereby STIPULATE and AGREE that the deadline for

5

exchanging proposed terms for construction shall be extended to August 17, 2011 and the

6

deadline for exchanging preliminary claim constructions and extrinsic evidence shall be extended

7

to September 7, 2011, to allow the parties time to finalize their settlement agreement and file the

8

requisite documents with the Court.

9
Respectfully submitted,

10
11

By: /s/ Mark E. Miller
Mark E. Miller
O’Melveny & Myers LLP
Counsel for Plaintiff
INTEGRATED DEVICE TECHNOLOGY, INC.

Dated: August 2, 2011

12
13
14
15

Dated: August 2, 2011

By:

/s/ David M. Barkan
David M. Barkan
Fish & Richardson P.C.
Counsel for Defendant
PHISON ELECTRONICS CORP.

16
17
18

Pursuant to General Order No. 45 X(B), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of
19
this document has been obtained from each of the above-listed signatories.
20
Respectfully submitted,

21
22
23
24

Dated: August 2, 2011

By: /s/ Mark E. Miller
Mark E. Miller
O’Melveny & Myers LLP
Counsel for Plaintiff
INTEGRATED DEVICE TECHNOLOGY, INC.

25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

-2-

CASE NO. CV-10-5168-RS

1

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED:

2
3

8/2/11
Dated: _________________________

4

_____________________________________
The Honorable Richard Seeborg
United States District Judge

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. CV-10-5168-RS