SCC Alameda Point LLC v. City of Alameda et al

Filing 61

ORDER Initial Case Management Conference and Motions set for 10/14/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/3/2011. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2011)

Download PDF
Case3:10-cv-05178-CRB Document60 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Filed08/02/11 Page1 of 2 DAVID B. NEWDORF, State Bar No. 172960 david@newdorf.com VICKI F. VAN FLEET, State Bar No. 164598 vicki@newdorf.com NEWDOR F LEGAL 220 Montgomery Street, Suite 1850 San Francisco, California 94104-4238 Telephone: (415) 357-1234 Facsimile: (866) 954-8448 GEOFFREY L. ROBINSON, State Bar No. 112997 grobinson@perkinscoie.com ALAN H. MURPHY, State Bar No. 262844 amurphy@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE LLP 4 Embarcadero Center San Francisco, California 94111-4131 Telephone: (415) 344-7000 Facsimile: (415) 344-7050 12 13 14 15 Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF ALAMEDA, ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, and COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 SCC ALAMEDA POINT, LLC, a limited liability company, 20 Plaintiff, 21 Case No. CV 10-5178 CRB [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER ON JOINT STATUS REPORT SUBMITTED JULY 14, 2011 vs. 22 23 24 25 26 27 CITY OF ALAMEDA, a municipal corporation; ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, a Joint Powers Authority; COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA, a public body corporate and politic; ANN MARIE GALLANT, an individual; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. 28 SCHEDULING ORDER – CASE NO. C10-5178 CRB Case3:10-cv-05178-CRB Document60 1 2 3 4 5 6 [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, AND PURSUANT TO THE JOINT STATUS REPORT SUBMITTED JULY 14, 2011, a.m. October 14, 2011 and that the following pending motions be heard at that date and time: 1. 2. 3. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Defendant Ann Marie Gallant’s special motion to strike the Second Amended Complaint (anti-SLAPP motion). 4. Defendant Ann Marie Gallant’s motion to strike portions of the Second Amended Complaint (Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f)). 13 14 Defendant Ann Marie Gallant’s motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)). 11 12 City of Alameda’s motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)). 9 10 10:00 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the initial case management conference is set for 9:00 7 8 Filed08/02/11 Page2 of 2 5. Plaintiff SCC Alameda Point LLC’s motion for sanctions for spoliation of evidence. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 1. SCC Alameda Point, LLC may file a supplemental opposition to the City of Alameda’s Motion to Dismiss by September 16. 2. City of Alameda may file a supplemental reply brief in support of the Motion to Dismiss by September 30, 2011. 3. All other oppositions will be filed and served three weeks before the hearing date, and all other reply briefs will be filed two weeks before the hearing date. 23 _____________________________________ Hon. Charles R. Breyer R. Breyer harles Judge C U.S. District Judge ER 1 C RT FO NO 28 ERED H LI 27 O ORD IT IS S A 26 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T R NIA Dated:__________________________ August 3, 2011 UNIT ED 25 S IT IS SO ORDERED. RT U O 24 N DI SCHEDULING ORDER – CASE NO. C10-5178 CRB S T R I C T OF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?