SCC Alameda Point LLC v. City of Alameda et al
Filing
61
ORDER Initial Case Management Conference and Motions set for 10/14/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/3/2011. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2011)
Case3:10-cv-05178-CRB Document60
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Filed08/02/11 Page1 of 2
DAVID B. NEWDORF, State Bar No. 172960
david@newdorf.com
VICKI F. VAN FLEET, State Bar No. 164598
vicki@newdorf.com
NEWDOR F LEGAL
220 Montgomery Street, Suite 1850
San Francisco, California 94104-4238
Telephone:
(415) 357-1234
Facsimile:
(866) 954-8448
GEOFFREY L. ROBINSON, State Bar No. 112997
grobinson@perkinscoie.com
ALAN H. MURPHY, State Bar No. 262844
amurphy@perkinscoie.com
PERKINS COIE LLP
4 Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, California 94111-4131
Telephone:
(415) 344-7000
Facsimile:
(415) 344-7050
12
13
14
15
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF ALAMEDA, ALAMEDA REUSE
AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, and
COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA
16
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
19
SCC ALAMEDA POINT, LLC, a limited
liability company,
20
Plaintiff,
21
Case No. CV 10-5178 CRB
[PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER ON
JOINT STATUS REPORT SUBMITTED
JULY 14, 2011
vs.
22
23
24
25
26
27
CITY OF ALAMEDA, a municipal corporation;
ALAMEDA REUSE AND
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, a Joint
Powers Authority; COMMUNITY
IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ALAMEDA, a public body corporate
and politic; ANN MARIE GALLANT, an
individual; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
Defendants.
28
SCHEDULING ORDER – CASE NO. C10-5178 CRB
Case3:10-cv-05178-CRB Document60
1
2
3
4
5
6
[PROPOSED] ORDER
FOR GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, AND PURSUANT TO THE JOINT STATUS
REPORT SUBMITTED JULY 14, 2011,
a.m. October 14, 2011 and that the following pending motions be heard at that date and time:
1.
2.
3.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Defendant Ann Marie Gallant’s special motion to strike the Second Amended
Complaint (anti-SLAPP motion).
4.
Defendant Ann Marie Gallant’s motion to strike portions of the Second Amended
Complaint (Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f)).
13
14
Defendant Ann Marie Gallant’s motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint
(Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)).
11
12
City of Alameda’s motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (Fed. R. Civ.
P. 12(b)(6)).
9
10
10:00
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the initial case management conference is set for 9:00
7
8
Filed08/02/11 Page2 of 2
5.
Plaintiff SCC Alameda Point LLC’s motion for sanctions for spoliation of
evidence.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that
1. SCC Alameda Point, LLC may file a supplemental opposition to the City of Alameda’s
Motion to Dismiss by September 16.
2. City of Alameda may file a supplemental reply brief in support of the Motion to
Dismiss by September 30, 2011.
3. All other oppositions will be filed and served three weeks before the hearing date, and
all other reply briefs will be filed two weeks before the hearing date.
23
_____________________________________
Hon. Charles R. Breyer R. Breyer
harles
Judge C
U.S. District Judge
ER
1
C
RT
FO
NO
28
ERED
H
LI
27
O ORD
IT IS S
A
26
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
R NIA
Dated:__________________________
August 3, 2011
UNIT
ED
25
S
IT IS SO ORDERED.
RT
U
O
24
N
DI
SCHEDULING ORDER – CASE NO. C10-5178 CRB S T R I C T
OF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?