Martin v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. et al

Filing 28

ORDER GRANTING 27 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF THE INIJUNCTIVE RELIEF ASPECT OF THE LAWSUIT AGAINST DEFENDANTS HARSCH INVESTMENT REALTY LLC, SERIES C, AND JAMESTOWN HARSCH ALAMEDA TOWNE CENTRE. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 7/6/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2012)

Download PDF
Case3:10-cv-05195-JSW Document27 Filed07/06/12 Page1 of 4 SIDNEY J. COHEN, ESQ., State Bar No. 39023 SIDNEY J. COHEN PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 2 427 Grand Avenue Oakland, CA 94610 3 Telephone: (510) 893-6682 1 4 Attorneys for Plaintiff CAROLYN MARTIN 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 CAROLYN MARTIN CASE NO. C10-05195 JSW Civil Rights 8 Plaintiff, 9 V. 10 KOHL’S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC; HARSCH INVESTMENT REALTY LLC, SERIES C; 12 JAMESTOWN HARSCH ALAMEDA TOWNE CENTRE, 13 LP, a Delaware Limited Partnership, and DOES 1-25, Inclusive, 11 14 15 Defendants. / 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stiplation And Order For Dismissal of Injunctive Relief Only STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF THE INJUNCTIVE RELIEF ASPECT OF THE LAWSUIT AGAINST DEFENDANTS HARSCH INVESTMENT REALTY LLC, SERIES C, AND JAMESTOWN HARSCH ALAMEDA TOWNE CENTRE, LP FRCP section 41 Case3:10-cv-05195-JSW Document27 Filed07/06/12 Page2 of 4 1 Plaintiff CAROLYN MARTIN and Defendants HARSCH 2 INVESTMENT REALTY LLC, Series C, a Delaware limited liability company 3 and JAMESTOWN HARSCH ALAMEDA TOWNE CENTRE, LP, whose name 4 has been changed to, and is now known as, JAMESTOWN SOUTH SHORE 5 CENTER, LP, by and through their attorneys of record, enter into this 6 “STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF THE INJUNCTIVE 7 RELIEF ASPECT OF THE LAWSUIT AGAINST DEFENDANTS HARSCH 8 INVESTMENT REALTY LLC, SERIES C, AND JAMESTOWN HARSCH 9 ALAMEDA TOWNE CENTRE, LP” pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 10 Procedure section 41. 11 Plaintiff filed this lawsuit on November 16, 2010. 12 Plaintiff and Defendants hereto have entered into a “Mutual Release And 13 Settlement Agreement For Injunctive Relief” which settles the injunctive relief 14 aspect of the lawsuit against Defendants HARSCH INVESTMENT REALTY 15 LLC, SERIES C, AND JAMESTOWN HARSCH ALAMEDA TOWNE 16 CENTRE, LP, whose name has been changed to, and is now known as, 17 JAMESTOWN SOUTH SHORE CENTER, LP . A copy of the “Mutual Release 18 And Settlement Agreement For Injunctive Relief ” is incorporated by reference 19 herein as if set forth in full. The Mutual Release And Settlement Agreement For 20 Injunctive Relief” as to Defendants HARSCH INVESTMENT REALTY LLC, 21 SERIES C, AND JAMESTOWN HARSCH ALAMEDA TOWNE CENTRE, LP 22 states in part that “The court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Settlement 23 Agreement...”. Plaintiff and Defendants hereto stipulate to the court retaining 24 jurisdiction to enforce the “Mutual Release And Settlement Agreement For 25 Injunctive Relief” as to Defendants hereto. 26 Plaintiff moves to dismiss with prejudice the injunctive relief aspect of 27 the lawsuit againstt against Defendants HARSCH INVESTMENT REALTY 28 LLC, SERIES C AND JAMESTOWN HARSCH ALAMEDA TOWNE Stiplation And Order For Dismissal of Injunctive Relief Only -1- Case3:10-cv-05195-JSW Document27 Filed07/06/12 Page3 of 4 1 CENTRE, LP, whose name has been changed to, and is now known as, 2 JAMESTOWN SOUTH SHORE CENTER, LP . 3 Defendants hereto, who have answered the complaint, agree to the 4 dismissal with prejudice of the injunctive relief aspect of the lawsuit as to them 5 only. 6 Plaintiff’s claim for injunctive relief, damages, and attorney’s fees, 7 litigation expenses, and costs against Defendant Kohl’s Department Stores, Inc , 8 and Plaintiff’s claim for damages and attorney’s fees, litigation expenses, and 9 costs against Defendants HARSCH INVESTMENT REALTY LLC, SERIES C 10 AND JAMESTOWN HARSCH ALAMEDA TOWNE CENTRE, LP, whose 11 name has been changed to, and is now known as, JAMESTOWN SOUTH 12 SHORE CENTER, LP have not been resolved, presently are in the negotiation 13 and mediation phase, and will be litigated if they are not resolved by negotiation 14 or mediation. 15 This case is not a class action, and no receiver has been appointed. 16 This Stipulation and Order may be signed in counterparts, and facsimile or 17 electronically transmitted signatures shall be as valid and as binding as original 18 signatures. 19 Wherefore, Plaintiff CAROLYN MARTIN and Defendants HARSCH 20 INVESTMENT REALTY LLC, SERIES C AND JAMESTOWN HARSCH 21 ALAMEDA TOWNE CENTRE, LP, whose name has been changed to, and is 22 now known as, JAMESTOWN SOUTH SHORE CENTER, LP, by and through 23 their attorneys of record, so stipulate. 24 Date: 7/5/12 SIDNEY J. COHEN PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 25 /s/ Sidney J. Cohen _____________________________ Sidney J. Cohen Attorney for Plaintiff Carolyn Martin 26 27 28 Stiplation And Order For Dismissal of Injunctive Relief Only -2- Case3:10-cv-05195-JSW Document27 Filed07/06/12 Page4 of 4 1 Date: 6/29/12 FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP 2 /s/ Adam C Dawson _____________________________ Adam C. Dawson Attorney for Defendants Harsch Investment Realty LLC,Series C, a Delaware limited liability company, Jamestown Harsch Alameda Towne Centre, LP And Jamestown South Shore Center, LP 3 4 5 6 7 8 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS SO ORDERED: 9 The injunctive relief aspect of the lawsuit as against Defendants 10 HARSCH INVESTMENT REALTY LLC, SERIES C AND JAMESTOWN 11 HARSCH ALAMEDA TOWNE CENTRE, LP, whose name has been changed 12 to, and is now known as, JAMESTOWN SOUTH SHORE CENTER, LP only is 13 dismissed with prejudice. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the 14 “Mutual Release And Settlement Agreement For Injunctive Relief ”between 15 Plaintiff and Defendants HARSCH INVESTMENT REALTY LLC, SERIES C 16 AND JAMESTOWN HARSCH ALAMEDA TOWNE CENTRE, LP, whose 17 name has been changed to, and is now known as, JAMESTOWN SOUTH 18 SHORE CENTER, LP 19 20 Date: July 6, 2012 Jeffrey S. White United States District 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stiplation And Order For Dismissal of Injunctive Relief Only -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?