Martin v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. et al
Filing
28
ORDER GRANTING 27 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF THE INIJUNCTIVE RELIEF ASPECT OF THE LAWSUIT AGAINST DEFENDANTS HARSCH INVESTMENT REALTY LLC, SERIES C, AND JAMESTOWN HARSCH ALAMEDA TOWNE CENTRE. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 7/6/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2012)
Case3:10-cv-05195-JSW Document27 Filed07/06/12 Page1 of 4
SIDNEY J. COHEN, ESQ., State Bar No. 39023
SIDNEY J. COHEN PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
2 427 Grand Avenue
Oakland, CA 94610
3 Telephone: (510) 893-6682
1
4
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CAROLYN MARTIN
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
CAROLYN MARTIN
CASE NO. C10-05195 JSW
Civil Rights
8
Plaintiff,
9
V.
10
KOHL’S DEPARTMENT STORES,
INC; HARSCH INVESTMENT
REALTY LLC, SERIES C;
12 JAMESTOWN HARSCH
ALAMEDA TOWNE CENTRE,
13 LP, a Delaware Limited Partnership,
and DOES 1-25, Inclusive,
11
14
15
Defendants.
/
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stiplation And Order For Dismissal of Injunctive Relief Only
STIPULATION AND ORDER
FOR DISMISSAL OF THE
INJUNCTIVE RELIEF ASPECT
OF THE LAWSUIT AGAINST
DEFENDANTS HARSCH
INVESTMENT REALTY LLC,
SERIES C, AND JAMESTOWN
HARSCH ALAMEDA TOWNE
CENTRE, LP
FRCP section 41
Case3:10-cv-05195-JSW Document27 Filed07/06/12 Page2 of 4
1
Plaintiff CAROLYN MARTIN and Defendants HARSCH
2
INVESTMENT REALTY LLC, Series C, a Delaware limited liability company
3
and JAMESTOWN HARSCH ALAMEDA TOWNE CENTRE, LP, whose name
4
has been changed to, and is now known as, JAMESTOWN SOUTH SHORE
5
CENTER, LP, by and through their attorneys of record, enter into this
6
“STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF THE INJUNCTIVE
7
RELIEF ASPECT OF THE LAWSUIT AGAINST DEFENDANTS HARSCH
8
INVESTMENT REALTY LLC, SERIES C, AND JAMESTOWN HARSCH
9
ALAMEDA TOWNE CENTRE, LP” pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
10
Procedure section 41.
11
Plaintiff filed this lawsuit on November 16, 2010.
12
Plaintiff and Defendants hereto have entered into a “Mutual Release And
13
Settlement Agreement For Injunctive Relief” which settles the injunctive relief
14
aspect of the lawsuit against Defendants HARSCH INVESTMENT REALTY
15
LLC, SERIES C, AND JAMESTOWN HARSCH ALAMEDA TOWNE
16
CENTRE, LP, whose name has been changed to, and is now known as,
17
JAMESTOWN SOUTH SHORE CENTER, LP . A copy of the “Mutual Release
18
And Settlement Agreement For Injunctive Relief ” is incorporated by reference
19
herein as if set forth in full. The Mutual Release And Settlement Agreement For
20
Injunctive Relief” as to Defendants HARSCH INVESTMENT REALTY LLC,
21
SERIES C, AND JAMESTOWN HARSCH ALAMEDA TOWNE CENTRE, LP
22
states in part that “The court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Settlement
23
Agreement...”. Plaintiff and Defendants hereto stipulate to the court retaining
24
jurisdiction to enforce the “Mutual Release And Settlement Agreement For
25
Injunctive Relief” as to Defendants hereto.
26
Plaintiff moves to dismiss with prejudice the injunctive relief aspect of
27
the lawsuit againstt against Defendants HARSCH INVESTMENT REALTY
28
LLC, SERIES C AND JAMESTOWN HARSCH ALAMEDA TOWNE
Stiplation And Order For Dismissal of Injunctive Relief Only -1-
Case3:10-cv-05195-JSW Document27 Filed07/06/12 Page3 of 4
1
CENTRE, LP, whose name has been changed to, and is now known as,
2
JAMESTOWN SOUTH SHORE CENTER, LP .
3
Defendants hereto, who have answered the complaint, agree to the
4
dismissal with prejudice of the injunctive relief aspect of the lawsuit as to them
5
only.
6
Plaintiff’s claim for injunctive relief, damages, and attorney’s fees,
7
litigation expenses, and costs against Defendant Kohl’s Department Stores, Inc ,
8
and Plaintiff’s claim for damages and attorney’s fees, litigation expenses, and
9
costs against Defendants HARSCH INVESTMENT REALTY LLC, SERIES C
10
AND JAMESTOWN HARSCH ALAMEDA TOWNE CENTRE, LP, whose
11
name has been changed to, and is now known as, JAMESTOWN SOUTH
12
SHORE CENTER, LP have not been resolved, presently are in the negotiation
13
and mediation phase, and will be litigated if they are not resolved by negotiation
14
or mediation.
15
This case is not a class action, and no receiver has been appointed.
16
This Stipulation and Order may be signed in counterparts, and facsimile or
17
electronically transmitted signatures shall be as valid and as binding as original
18
signatures.
19
Wherefore, Plaintiff CAROLYN MARTIN and Defendants HARSCH
20
INVESTMENT REALTY LLC, SERIES C AND JAMESTOWN HARSCH
21
ALAMEDA TOWNE CENTRE, LP, whose name has been changed to, and is
22
now known as, JAMESTOWN SOUTH SHORE CENTER, LP, by and through
23
their attorneys of record, so stipulate.
24
Date: 7/5/12
SIDNEY J. COHEN
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
25
/s/ Sidney J. Cohen
_____________________________
Sidney J. Cohen
Attorney for Plaintiff
Carolyn Martin
26
27
28
Stiplation And Order For Dismissal of Injunctive Relief Only -2-
Case3:10-cv-05195-JSW Document27 Filed07/06/12 Page4 of 4
1
Date: 6/29/12
FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL
LLP
2
/s/ Adam C Dawson
_____________________________
Adam C. Dawson
Attorney for Defendants
Harsch Investment Realty
LLC,Series C, a Delaware limited
liability company, Jamestown
Harsch Alameda Towne Centre, LP
And Jamestown South Shore Center,
LP
3
4
5
6
7
8
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS SO ORDERED:
9
The injunctive relief aspect of the lawsuit as against Defendants
10
HARSCH INVESTMENT REALTY LLC, SERIES C AND JAMESTOWN
11
HARSCH ALAMEDA TOWNE CENTRE, LP, whose name has been changed
12
to, and is now known as, JAMESTOWN SOUTH SHORE CENTER, LP only is
13
dismissed with prejudice. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the
14
“Mutual Release And Settlement Agreement For Injunctive Relief ”between
15
Plaintiff and Defendants HARSCH INVESTMENT REALTY LLC, SERIES C
16
AND JAMESTOWN HARSCH ALAMEDA TOWNE CENTRE, LP, whose
17
name has been changed to, and is now known as, JAMESTOWN SOUTH
18
SHORE CENTER, LP
19
20
Date:
July 6, 2012
Jeffrey S. White
United States District
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stiplation And Order For Dismissal of Injunctive Relief Only -3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?