Martin v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. et al

Filing 43

ORDER GRANTING 42 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 4/19/2013. Case Management Conference set for 4/26/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 2/8/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2013)

Download PDF
Case3:10-cv-05195-JSW Document42 Filed02/08/13 Page1 of 3 SIDNEY J. COHEN, ESQ., State Bar No. 39023 SIDNEY J. COHEN PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 2 427 Grand Avenue Oakland, CA 94610 3 Telephone: (510) 893-6682 Fax: (510) 893-9450 1 4 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff CAROLYN MARTIN TIMOTHY L. PIERCE State Bar No. 141170 K & L GATES, LLP 7 10100 Santa Monica Blvd. 7th Floor 8 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: (310) 552-5000 (310) 558-552-5001 9 Fax: 6 10 Attorneys for Defendant KOHL’ DEPARTMENT STORES, INC. 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 CAROLYN MARTIN 15 16 CASE NO. C10-05195 Civil Rights Plaintiff, V. 17 18 19 20 21 KOHL’S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC; HARSCH INVESTMENT REALTY LLC, SERIES C; JAMESTOWN HARSCH ALAMEDA TOWNE CENTRE, LP, a Delaware Limited Partnership, and DOES 1-25, Inclusive, Defendants. / 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JointStipulation And [Proposed] Order To Continue Case Management Statement JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case3:10-cv-05195-JSW Document42 Filed02/08/13 Page2 of 3 1 Plaintiff CAROLYN MARTIN, by and through her attorney, and defendant 2 KOHL’S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC, by and through its attorney, file this 3 “STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE 4 MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE,” presently scheduled for April 12, 2013, to 5 April 26, 2013 because Plaintiff’s counsel, Sidney J. Cohen, a solo practitioner, will 6 be out of Northern California and unavailable on April 12, 2013. 7 The parties further stipulate and submit the following in support of this 8 request to continue the case management conference from April 12, 2013 to April 9 26, 2013. 10 1. By Order dated October 30, 2012, the Court set February 8, 2013 as the 11 date for the parties’ Case Management Conference. (Docket # 36) 12 2. On February 1, 2013, the parties e filed their Joint Case Management 13 Statement. (Docket # 40) 14 3. By Clerk’s Notice dated February 6, 2013, the Court rescheduled 15 the Case Management Conference to April 12, 2013. (Docket # 41) 16 3. Because Plaintiff’s counsel, a solo practitioner, will be out of Northern 17 California and unavailable on April 12, 2013, the parties request this short, two 18 week continuance to April 26, 2013 for the case management conference. 19 4, If the Court is unable to reschedule the case management conference to 20 April 26, 2013, then the parties request that the Court reschedule the conference to 21 May 17, 2013. In this regard, plaintiff’s counsel will be out of Northen California 22 and unavailable on May 3, 2013 and defendant’s counsel has a likely conflict in his 23 schedule on May 10, 2012. 24 IT IS SO STIPULATED: 25 Date: 2/8/13 26 SIDNEY J. COHEN PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION /s/ Sidney J. Cohen Sidney J. Cohen Attorney for Plaintiff Carolyn Martin 27 28 JointStipulation And [Proposed] Order To Continue Case Management Statement -1- Case3:10-cv-05195-JSW Document42 Filed02/08/13 Page3 of 3 1 Date: Feb 7, 2013 K & L GATES, LLP /s/ Timothy L. Pierce 2 Timothy L. Pierce Attorneys for Defendant Kohl’s Department Stores, Inc. 3 4 ORDER 5 Having considered and approved the aforesaid Stipulation, the case 6 management conference is continued from April 12, 2013 to April 26, 2013. A 7 supplemental joint case management statement shall be due on or before April 19, 8 2013. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 Date: February 8, 2013 Jeffrey S. White United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JointStipulation And [Proposed] Order To Continue Case Management Statement -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?