Martin v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. et al
Filing
43
ORDER GRANTING 42 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 4/19/2013. Case Management Conference set for 4/26/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 2/8/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2013)
Case3:10-cv-05195-JSW Document42 Filed02/08/13 Page1 of 3
SIDNEY J. COHEN, ESQ., State Bar No. 39023
SIDNEY J. COHEN PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
2 427 Grand Avenue
Oakland, CA 94610
3 Telephone: (510) 893-6682
Fax:
(510) 893-9450
1
4
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CAROLYN MARTIN
TIMOTHY L. PIERCE State Bar No. 141170
K & L GATES, LLP
7 10100 Santa Monica Blvd.
7th Floor
8 Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: (310) 552-5000
(310) 558-552-5001
9 Fax:
6
10
Attorneys for Defendant
KOHL’ DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
CAROLYN MARTIN
15
16
CASE NO. C10-05195
Civil Rights
Plaintiff,
V.
17
18
19
20
21
KOHL’S DEPARTMENT STORES,
INC; HARSCH INVESTMENT
REALTY LLC, SERIES C;
JAMESTOWN HARSCH
ALAMEDA TOWNE CENTRE,
LP, a Delaware Limited Partnership,
and DOES 1-25, Inclusive,
Defendants.
/
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JointStipulation And [Proposed] Order To
Continue Case Management Statement
JOINT STIPULATION
AND [PROPOSED ] ORDER
TO CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case3:10-cv-05195-JSW Document42 Filed02/08/13 Page2 of 3
1
Plaintiff CAROLYN MARTIN, by and through her attorney, and defendant
2
KOHL’S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC, by and through its attorney, file this
3
“STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE
4
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE,” presently scheduled for April 12, 2013, to
5
April 26, 2013 because Plaintiff’s counsel, Sidney J. Cohen, a solo practitioner, will
6
be out of Northern California and unavailable on April 12, 2013.
7
The parties further stipulate and submit the following in support of this
8
request to continue the case management conference from April 12, 2013 to April
9
26, 2013.
10
1.
By Order dated October 30, 2012, the Court set February 8, 2013 as the
11 date for the parties’ Case Management Conference. (Docket # 36)
12
2.
On February 1, 2013, the parties e filed their Joint Case Management
13 Statement. (Docket # 40)
14
3.
By Clerk’s Notice dated February 6, 2013, the Court rescheduled
15 the Case Management Conference to April 12, 2013. (Docket # 41)
16
3.
Because Plaintiff’s counsel, a solo practitioner, will be out of Northern
17 California and unavailable on April 12, 2013, the parties request this short, two
18 week continuance to April 26, 2013 for the case management conference.
19
4,
If the Court is unable to reschedule the case management conference to
20 April 26, 2013, then the parties request that the Court reschedule the conference to
21 May 17, 2013. In this regard, plaintiff’s counsel will be out of Northen California
22 and unavailable on May 3, 2013 and defendant’s counsel has a likely conflict in his
23 schedule on May 10, 2012.
24
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
25 Date: 2/8/13
26
SIDNEY J. COHEN
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
/s/ Sidney J. Cohen
Sidney J. Cohen
Attorney for Plaintiff Carolyn Martin
27
28
JointStipulation And [Proposed] Order To
Continue Case Management Statement
-1-
Case3:10-cv-05195-JSW Document42 Filed02/08/13 Page3 of 3
1 Date: Feb 7, 2013
K & L GATES, LLP
/s/ Timothy L. Pierce
2
Timothy L. Pierce
Attorneys for Defendant Kohl’s Department
Stores, Inc.
3
4
ORDER
5
Having considered and approved the aforesaid Stipulation, the case
6
management conference is continued from April 12, 2013 to April 26, 2013. A
7
supplemental joint case management statement shall be due on or before April 19,
8
2013.
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
Date: February 8, 2013
Jeffrey S. White
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JointStipulation And [Proposed] Order To
Continue Case Management Statement
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?