Mendenhall et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association et al

Filing 53

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 18, 2011. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 ELAINE MENDENHALL and JOHN MENDENHALL, III, No. C-10-5302 MMC ORDER DISMISSING ACTION 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. 14 15 JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 / 18 19 By order filed April 25, 2011, the Court granted defendant WCS Lending, LLC’s 20 21 (“WCS”) motion to dismiss plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) and granted 22 defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPMorgan”) and Chase Home Finance LLC’s 23 (“Chase”) motion to dismiss the FAC. In so doing, the Court afforded plaintiffs leave to 24 amend their claims against WCS, JPMorgan, and Chase, and directed plaintiffs to file any 25 Second Amended Complaint no later than May 13, 2011. Plaintiffs did not file a Second 26 Amended Complaint within the time specified. 27 // 28 // 1 2 Accordingly, plaintiffs’ having failed to amend their claims against the remaining defendants,1 the above-titled action is hereby DISMISSED. 3 The Clerk shall close the file and vacate all scheduled dates. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: May 18, 2011 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 By separate order filed concurrently herewith, plaintiffs’ claims against unserved defendant Tal Shpritzman have been dismissed pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?