Marshall v. Pacific Office Automation

Filing 14

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERNCE AND RELATED DEADLINES. Further Case Management Conference re-set for 3/18/2011 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 3/8/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2011)

Download PDF
1 Rochelle L. Wilcox (SB# 197790) DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 2 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94111-6533 3 Telephone: (415) 276-6500 Facsimile: (415) 276-6599 4 Email: rochellewilcox@dwt.com 5 Attorneys for Defendant PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION, INC. 6 7 8 9 10 MICHAEL MARSHALL, 11 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION, INC., and ) DOES 1 through 20, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C 10-05406 JCS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES Current Date: Time: Courtroom: March 11, 2011 1:30 p.m. A IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Proposed Date: March 18, 2011 Time: 1:30 p.m. Courtroom: A 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CMC Case No. 3:10-cv-05406-JCS DWT 16686191v1 0060489-000006 1 COME NOW Plaintiff and Defendant, by and through their respective counsel, and do 2 hereby stipulate, and request that the Court Order, that the Case Management Conference 3 currently scheduled for March 11, 2011 at 1:30 p.m., be continued, to be held on March 18, 2011 4 at 1:30 p.m. This continuance is requested because Defendant's counsel has a previously5 scheduled court appearance in Alameda County on March 11, 2011 at 3:30 and has been advised 6 by the Court's clerk that the Alameda County appearance may result in a calendar conflict. 7 In addition, the parties stipulate, and respectfully request that the Court Order, that the 8 parties' deadline for exchanging their initial disclosures and the corresponding filing deadlines for 9 the parties' Joint Case Management Statement and Rule 26(f) Report also be continued for one 10 week, from the current deadline of March 4, 2011 to a new deadline of March 11, 2011. 11 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 12 DATED: March 4, 2011 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: March 4, 2011 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP ROCHELLE L. WILCOX By: /s/ Rochelle L. Wilcox Rochelle L. Wilcox Attorneys for Defendant PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION, INC. LAW OFFICES OF VICTOR C. THUESEN By: /s/ Victor C. Thuesen Victor C. Thuesen The filer attests that Victor Thuesen's authorization to include his e-signature was obtained via e-mail on March 4, 2011 Attorney for Plaintiff MICHAEL MARSHALL 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CMC Case No. 3:10-cv-05406-JCS DWT 16686191v1 0060489-000006 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 It is so ordered. ORDER ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O UNIT ED 8th Dated this _____ day of March, 2011. S N F D IS T IC T O R DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CMC Case No. 3:10-cv-05406-JCS DWT 16686191v1 0060489-000006 A se Ju ge Jo HonorabledJoseph C. Spero United States District Court ER C LI FO ph C. S pero R NIA NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?