Marshall v. Pacific Office Automation

Filing 35

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 8/31/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2011)

Case3:10-cv-05406-JCS Document34

Filed08/30/11 Page1 of 2

Victor C. Thuesen (SBN 92467)
2

LAW OFFICES OF VICTOR C. TIIUESEN

4
5

11 Western Avenue
Petaluma, California 94952
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

6

Attorney for Plaintiff Michael Marshall

3

7

8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MICHAEL MARSHALL,

12

Plaintiff,

13

VS.

14
15
16

)
)
)
)
)
)

No.

C 10-05406 JCS

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION, INC., )
)
Defendant.
)
)

17
It is hereby stipulated by Plaintiff Michael Marshall and Defendant Pacific Office Automation,

18
19

Inc., through their respective counsel, that the herein action may be dismissed with prejudice pursuant

20

1/1

21

III

22

23

III

24

III

25

III

26

III

27

//I

28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

Case3:10-cv-05406-JCS Document34

1
2

Filed08/30/11 Page2 of 2

to Rule 41 (a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, each party to bear its own costs.
Dated: August 29,2011

3

4

5

\j

6

By:_ _ _......1.-....,L-_ _ _.=:.-I--,oq--"IE_

7

VICTa C. THUESEN
Attorney for Plaintiff Michael Marshall

8

9
Dated: August2{, 2011

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

10

11

12

By:~::::::;z~I--_---_ _ _­

13

S

21

FO

LI

ER

H

20

RT

19

ero

Sp
seph C.
Judge Jo

NO

18

D

RDERE

OO
IT IS S

A

17

Dated: 8/31/11

UNIT
ED

16

RT
U
O

IS

AL.MOONEY
ey for Defendant Pacific Office Automation

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

R NIA

14

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

2