Sony Electronics, Inc. v. MedioStream, Inc.

Filing 60

STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/22/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2011)

Download PDF
*E-Filed 3/22/11* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 K ENYON & K ENYON LLP NEW YORK Megan Olesek (SBN 191218) KENYON & KENYON LLP 333 West San Carlos Street, Suite 600 San Jose, CA 95110-2731 Telephone: 408.975.7500 Facsimile: 408.975.7501 Email: molesek@kenyon.com Lewis V. Popovski (pro hac vice) Michelle M. Carniaux (pro hac vice) Sheila Mortazavi (pro hac vice) Matt Berkowitz (pro hac vice) Zaed M. Billah (pro hac vice) KENYON & KENYON LLP One Broadway New York, NY 10004-1007 Telephone: 212.425.7200 Facsimile: 212.425.5288 Email: lpopovski@kenyon.com Email: mcarniaux@kenyon.com Email: smortazavi@kenyon.com Email: mberkowitz@kenyon.com Email: zbillah@kenyon.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Sony Electronics Inc. SONY ELECTRONICS INC., Plaintiff, v. MEDIOSTREAM, INC., Defendant. Case No. 03:10-cv-05410-RS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS CASE NO. 03:10-CV-05410-RS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 K ENYON & K ENYON LLP NEW YORK Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: Private ADR (please identify process and provider) _________________ Private Mediation ____________________________________ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) other requested deadline ______________________________________ Dated: March 17, 2011 /s/Lewis V. Popovski Attorney for Plaintiff Sony Electronics Inc. Dated: March 17, 2011 /s/ Byron Cooper Attorney for Defendant MedioStream, Inc. -2CASE NO. 03:10-CV-05410-RS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: Non-binding Arbitration Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) Mediation Private ADR Deadline for ADR session 90 days from the date of this order. other _______________________ IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 K ENYON & K ENYON LLP NEW YORK Dated: 3/21/11 Hon. Richard Seeborg United States District Judge STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS CASE NO. 03:10-CV-05410-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?