Molieri et al v. County of Marin et al

Filing 102

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE FEBRUARY 22, 2013 FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Further Case Management Conference currently set for February 22, 2013 is continued to March 15, 2013. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 20, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/20/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669 City Attorney CHERYL ADAMS, State Bar #164194 Chief Trial Deputy MICHAEL GERCHOW, State Bar #245706 Deputy City Attorney Fox Plaza 1390 Market Street, Sixth Floor San Francisco, California 94102-5408 Telephone: (415) 554-3936 Facsimile: (415) 554-3837 E-Mail: michael.gerchow@sfgov.org 7 8 9 Attorneys for Defendants CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; SAN FRANCISCO POLICE SERGEANT R. COX; SAN FRANCISCO POLICE SERGEANT J. O'MALLEY 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 DANILO MARTIN MOLIERI, AND DANIEL STEVEN MOLIERI, Case No. CV 10 5430 MMC STIPULATION TO CONTINUE FEBRUARY 22, 2013 FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED ORDER] ORDER THEREON Plaintiffs, vs. COUNTY OF MARIN, Marin County Sheriff's Trial Date: Sergeant J. SCARDINA, Sheriff's Deputy ERIC RICHARDSON, Sheriff's Deputy BONDANZA; CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, San Francisco Police Sergeant R. COX; San Francisco Police Sergeant J. O'MALLEY; and DOES 1-25, inclusive Not Set Defendants. 22 23 24 STIPULATION Pursuant to Local Rule 7-12, Defendants City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco 25 Police Sergeant R. Cox, San Francisco Police Sergeant J. O'Malley (the "San Francisco Defendants"), 26 the County of Marin, Marin County Sheriff's Sergeant J. Scardina, Sheriff's Deputy Eric Richardson, 27 Sheriff's Deputy Bondanza (the "Marin Defendants"), and Plaintiffs Danilo Molieri and Daniel Molieri 28 stipulate and jointly request continuance of the further case management conference as follow: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE FURTHER CMC C-10-5430 MMC 1 n:\lit\li2012\110809\00828772.doc 1. 2 3 This matter is presently set for a further case management conference on February 22, 2. 1 Counsel for defendants City and County of San Francisco, Warren Metlitzky and 2013; 4 Michael Gerchow are currently in trial in the matter of Telitha Ball v. Ernest Ferrando, San Francisco 5 Superior Court No. CGC-08-472360 and have been since January 28, 2013. Counsel estimate the trial 6 shall continue through no earlier than February 26, 2013. 7 3. The parties hereby stipulate to an entry of an order continuing the further case 8 management conference, presently set for February 22, 2013, to March 8, 2013, or another date 9 convenient to the Court. 10 11 IT IS SO STIPULATED Dated: February 20, 2013 DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney CHERYL ADAMS Chief Trial Deputy MICHAEL GERCHOW Deputy City Attorneys 12 13 14 15 By: /s/ Michael A. Gerchow MICHAEL GERCHOW 16 Attorneys for San Francisco Defendants 17 18 Dated: February 20, 2013 PATRICK K. FAULKNER County Council RENEE GIACOMINI BREWER 19 20 By: /s/ Renee Giacomini Brewer RENEE GIACOMINI BREWER 21 22 Attorneys for Marin County Defendant 23 24 25 26 Dated: February 20, 2013 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS By: /s/ John L. Burris JOHN L. BURRIS Attorneys for Plaintiffs 27 28 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE FURTHER CMC C-10-5430 MMC 2 n:\lit\li2012\110809\00828772.doc ORDER 1 2 Having considered the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, the Further Case 3 Management Conference currently set for February 22, 2013 is hereby continued to March 8, 2013 at 4 10:30 a.m. March 15, 2013. 5 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 DATED: February 20, 2013 By: 8 Hon. Maxine M. Chesney UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE FURTHER CMC C-10-5430 MMC 3 n:\lit\li2012\110809\00828772.doc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?