Molieri et al v. County of Marin et al

Filing 99

ORDER. The case management conference scheduled for February 1, 2013 is continued to February 22, 2013 at 10:30 a.m. No further Joint Case Management Statement need be filed, unless the circumstances set forth in the statement filed January 25, 2013 have changed. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 29, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 JOHN L. BURRIS, ESQ. CSB#69888 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS Airport Corporate Centre 7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120 Oakland, CA 94621-1939 Tel: (510) 839-5200 Fax: (510) 839-3882 E/M: John.Burris@JohnBurrisLaw.com Attorneys for Danilo Martin Molieri And Daniel Steven Molieri, Plaintiffs 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 (SAN FRANCISCO) 12 13 14 DANIEL MARTIN MOLIERI and, DANIEL STEVEN MOLIERI, Complaint Filed: 12/1/2010 Plaintiffs, 15 16 vs 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 CASE NO. C-10-5430 MMC STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND (PROPOSED) ORDER COUNTY OF MARIN; Marin County Sheriff’s Sergeant J. SCARDINA; Sheriff’s Deputy ERIC RICHARDSON; Sheriff’s Deputy BONDANZA; CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; San Francisco Police Sergeant R. COX; San Francisco Police Sergeant J. O’MALLEY; and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, Defendants. -----------------------------------------------------/ STIPULATION 27 The parties in this, the above-entitled matter, by and through their respective counsel of 28 record, stipulate and agree to the following in support of their request to the court to continue STIPULATION TO MODIFY PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER 1 1 the case management conference, currently scheduled for February 1, 2013 at 10:30 a.m., to 2 February 22, 2013 at 10:30 a.m. 3 4 5 Whereas the discovery in this case is complete, and dispositive motions argued and ruled upon by the court without appeal, the parties filed their joint case management statement on 6 January 25, 2013. Subsequently, plaintiffs’ counsel became aware of a scheduling conflict that 7 cannot be circumvented. In consultation with defendants’ counsel, it was determined that given 8 trial scheduling (noted in the joint case management statement) February 22, 2013 is the only 9 commonly available date that comports with the Court’s case management conference calendar. 10 11 The parties request the Court continue the pending case management conference from February 1, 2013 to February 22, 2013. If that date is not available to the Court, it is requested 12 13 that the case management conference be vacated and that counsel be permitted to submit dates 14 that are suitable to the Court’s calendar. Currently, no date for the pretrial conference or trial 15 has been set. 16 17 Dated: January 28, 2013 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS 18 19 By: ___/S/JOHN L. BURRIS____ _________ John L. Burris, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Danilo Martin Molieri and Daniel Steven Molieri 20 21 22 23 24 Dated: January 28, 2013 PATRICK K. FAULKNER County Counsel 25 26 27 28 By: ___/S/RENEE GIACOMINI BREWER __ Renee Giacomini Brewer. Deputy County Counsel Attorneys for County of Marin STIPULATION TO MODIFY PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER 2 1 Dated: January 28, 2013 2 3 4 DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney JOANNE HOEPER Chief Trial Deputy By: ___/S/MICHAEL GERCHOW_________ Michael Gerchow Deputy City Attorney Attorneys for Defendant City and County of San Francisco 5 6 7 8 ORDER 9 10 The court, having considered the parties’ stipulation and good cause appearing, 11 IT IS ORDERED that the case management conference scheduled for February 1, 12 13 14 15 2013 is continued to February 22, 1013 at 10:30 a.m. No further Joint Case Management Statement need be filed, unless the circumstances set forth in the statement filed January 25, 2013 have changed. Dated: January 29, 2013 ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO MODIFY PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?