Rambus Inc v. LSI Corporation

Filing 9

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/20/10. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2010)

Download PDF
Rambus Inc v. LSI Corporation Doc. 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP DAVID E. SIPIORA (State Bar No. 124951) 1400 Wewatta Street, Suite 600 Denver, CO 80202-5556 Telephone: (303) 571-4000 Facsimile: (303) 571-4321 Email: desipiora@townsend.com TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP THEODORE G. BROWN III (State Bar No. 114672) JULIE J. HAN (State Bar No. 215279) 379 Lytton Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94301 Telephone: (650) 326-2400 Facsimile: (650) 326-2422 Email: tgbrown@townsend.com Email: jjhan@townsend.com Attorneys for Defendant LSI CORPORATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION RAMBUS INC., Plaintiff, v. LSI CORPORATION, Defendant. Case No. 10-cv-05446-EMC STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT ; ORDER Plaintiff Rambus Inc. ("Rambus") and Defendant LSI Corporation ("LSI") hereby stipulate through their respective attorneys as follows: WHEREAS, on December 2, 2010, Rambus served its Complaint upon LSI; WHEREAS, LSI's Answer or other response to the Complaint is presently due on or before December 23, 2010; and WHEREAS, Rambus and LSI, through their respective attorneys, have agreed to extend by thirty (30) days the time by which LSI must answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CASE NO. 10-CV-05446-EMC 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective attorneys that LSI will have until and including January 24, 2011 to file and serve its Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. DATED: December 16, 2010 MUNGER, TOLLES, & OLSON LLP By: /s/ Peter A. Detre Peter A. Detre Attorneys for Plaintiff RAMBUS INC. DATED: December 16, 2010 TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP By: /s/ Julie J. Han Julie J. Han Attorneys for Defendant LSI CORPORATION PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 12/20 DATED: ___________________, 2010 UNIT ED S S DISTRICT TE C TA ER 63053623 v1 N D IS T IC T R OF A C LI FO dward Judge E M. Che n R NIA Honorable Edward RED E M. Chen United SO ORD States Magistrate Judge IS RT U O IT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CASE NO. 10-CV-05446-EMC NO RT H 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTESTATION CLAUSE REGARDING SIGNATURES Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that I have on file permission to sign for counsel, as indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP By: /s/ Julie J. Han Julie J. Han Attorneys for Defendant LSI CORPORATION STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CASE NO. 10-CV-05446-EMC 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?