Rambus Inc v. LSI Corporation
Filing
116
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/26/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
.
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
RAMBUS INC.,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
vs.
DENYING
[PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING
TIME FOR HEARING ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO LIMIT THE
NUMBER OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
LSI CORPORATION,
16
17
Case No. 3:10-cv-05446 RS
Defendant.
RAMBUS INC.,
18
Case No. 3:10-cv-05449 RS
Plaintiff,
19
vs.
20
21
STMICROELECTRONICS N.V.;
STMICROELECTRONICS INC.,
22
Defendants.
23
24
25
////
26
////
27
////
28
////
-1CASE NOS. C 10-05446 RS & C 10-05449 RS
[Proposed] Order Shortening Time
Printed on Recycled Paper
1
After having considered the papers filed by Defendants LSI Corporation, STMicroelectronics
2
N.V., and STMicroelectronics Inc. in support of their unopposed Motion for Order Shortening Time
3
for Hearing on their Motion to Limit the Number of Asserted Claims filed with the Court on October
4
24, 2012, the inferences reasonably deducible therefrom, and for good cause shown,
5
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. Defendants’ Motion to Limit the
6
Number of Asserted Claims shall be heard on November 15, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3 on
7
the 17th Floor of the United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco. Plaintiff
8
Rambus Inc. shall file its opposition papers on November 7, 2012. Defendants shall file their reply
9
papers on November 12, 2012.
R NIA
FO
ER
H
16
RT
15
NO
14
eeborg
ichard S
_________________________________________
Judge R
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
LI
13
D
DENIE
A
12
10/26/12
Dated: ______________________________
UNIT
ED
11
S
IT IS SO ORDERED.
RT
U
O
10
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2CASE NOS. C 10-05446 RS & C 10-05449 RS
[Proposed] Order Shortening Time
Printed on Recycled Paper
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?