Eastman Kodak Company v. Epson Imaging Devices Corporation et al

Filing 11

ORDER granting extenstion of time to respond to complaint (Eastman Kodak) re 10 Stipulation. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2011) Modified on 5/3/2011 (ys, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

CHRISTOPHER A. NEDEAU (CA 81297)
CARL L. BLUMENSTEIN (CA 124158)
KATHARINE CHAO (CA 247571)
NOSSAMAN LLP
50 California Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
415.398.3600
Facsimile:
415.398.2438
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA

9
10
11
12
13
14

KARL D. BELGUM (CA 122752)
JOHN R. FOOTE (CA 99674)
NIXON PEABODY LLC
One Embarcadero Center, 18th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
415.984.8200
Facsimile:
415.984.8300
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

15

Attorneys for Plaintiff
EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY

16

[Additional counsel listed on signature page]

17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

19
20
21
22

This Document Relates To:

Case NO. 3:10-CV-5452 SI

Case No. 3:10-CV-5452 SI

MDL NO. 3:07-MD-1827 SI

EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY,

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT

Plaintiff,

23
24
25

vs.

Date Action Filed: December 1, 2010

EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORP., et al.,
Defendants.

26
27
28
257886_1.DOC

MASTER FILE NO. 3:07-MD-1827 SI
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-10-5452 SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

1

WHEREAS plaintiff Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”) filed a complaint in the above-

2

captioned case against defendants Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, Epson Electronics America,

3

Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc, Toshiba Mobile Display

4

Technology Co., Ltd., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., AU Optronics Corporation, and AU

5

Optronics Corporation America (collectively, “Stipulating Defendants”) on December 1, 2010

6

(“Complaint”);

7
8

WHEREAS the Court ordered Stipulating Defendants to respond to the Complaint by May 3,
2011 pursuant to stipulation , see Dkt. No. 7;

9

WHEREAS Kodak and the Stipulating Defendants have now agreed that Stipulating Defendants

10

shall have up to and including May 12, 2011 to respond to the Complaint, pending approval of the

11

Court;

12

THEREFORE, Kodak and the Stipulating Defendants hereby agree:

13

The Stipulating Defendants shall have up to and including May 12, 2011 to respond to the

14

Complaint.

15
16

DATED: April 26, 2011
By: /s/ Christopher A. Nedeau
Christopher A. Nedeau (CA Bar No. 81297)
NOSSAMAN LLP
50 California Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-4799
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]

17
18
19
20
21
22

Attorneys for Defendants
AU Optronics Corporation and
AU Optronics Corporation America

23
24
25
26
27
28
257886_1.DOC

1

MASTER FILE NO. 3:07-MD-1827 SI
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-10-5452 SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

1
By: /s/ Stuart C. Plunkett
Melvin R. Goldman (Ca Bar No. 34097)
Stephen P. Freccero (CA Bar No. 131093)
Derek F. Foran (CA Bar No. 224569)
Stuart C. Plunkett (CA Bar No. 187971)
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-2482
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Counsel for Defendants
Epson Imaging Devices Corporation and
Epson Electronics America, Inc.

11
12
13
14
15

By: /s/ John H. Chung
John H. Chung (admitted pro hac vice)
WHITE & CASE LLP
1155 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036-2787
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]

16
17
18
19
20

Counsel for Defendants
Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Electronic
Components, Inc., Toshiba Mobile Display Technology
Co., Ltd. and Toshiba America Information Systems,
Inc.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
257886_1.DOC

2

MASTER FILE NO. 3:07-MD-1827 SI
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-10-5452 SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

1
By: /s/ John R. Foote
Karl D. Belgum (CA Bar No. 122752)
John R. Foote (CA Bar No. 99674)
NIXON PEABODY LLC
One Embarcadero Center, 18th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Counsel for Plaintiff Eastman Kodak Company

9
10
11

Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this
document has been obtained from the signatories to this document.

12
13

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

14
15

By: _______________________________________

16

Judge of the U.S. District Court, N.D. California

17

5/2/11
Date:

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
257886_1.DOC

3

MASTER FILE NO. 3:07-MD-1827 SI
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-10-5452 SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT