Eastman Kodak Company v. Epson Imaging Devices Corporation et al

Filing 112

ORDER of Dismissal of Epson Defts re 111 [MDL No.7771]. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 4/24/13. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2013) Modified on 4/25/2013 (ysS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 4 5 6 7 IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION Case No. 3:07-MD-1827-SI MDL No. 1827 [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF EPSON DEFENDANTS THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: 8 Case No. 10-CV-5452-SI 9 10 EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 v. EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, orders as follows: 1. Claims asserted by Plaintiff Eastman Kodak Company against Defendants Epson 20 Imaging Devices Corporation and Epson Electronics America, Inc. are dismissed with prejudice 21 pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 22 2. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 23 3. This Order does not affect the rights or claims of Plaintiffs against any other defendant 24 or alleged co-conspirator in the above-captioned litigations. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 24th April This ____ day of ______, 2013. 27 28 _____________________________________________ Hon. Susan Y. Illston United States District Court Judge MASTER FILE NO. 3:07-MD-1827-SI CASE NO. 3:10-CV-5452-SI [PROPOSED ORDER] REGARDING DISMISSAL OF EPSON DEFENDANTS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?