SB Liquidation Trust v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
Filing
134
ORDER by Judge Susan Illston granting (8597) Stipulation in case 3:07-md-01827-SI; granting (133) Stipulation in case 3:10-cv-05458-SI STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OFSHARP CORPORATION AND SHARPELECTRONICS CORPORATION (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
SUSMAN GODFREY LLP
STEVEN G. SKLAVER (CA Bar No. 237612)
ssklaver@susmangodfrey.com
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 950
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: 310-789-3123
Facsimile: 310-789-3150
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SB LIQUIDATION TRUST
6
[additional counsel listed on signature page]
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI
MDL No. 1827
15
This Document Relates To:
16
Case No. 10-cv-5458 SI
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF
SHARP CORPORATION AND SHARP
ELECTRONICS CORPORATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
17
SB LIQUIDATION TRUST,
13
14
Plaintiff,
18
19
v.
20
AU OPTRONICS CORP., et al.,
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-12861196v1/012072
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827
1
Plaintiff SB Liquidation Trust (“SBLT”) and Defendants Sharp Corporation and
2
Sharp Electronics Corporation (collectively, “Sharp”), by and through undersigned counsel,
3
stipulate and agree that SBLT hereby dismisses with prejudice all claims being asserted
4
against Sharp in the above-captioned action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules
5
of Civil Procedure, and each party agrees to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. This
6
stipulation does not affect the rights or claims of SBLT against any other defendant or
7
alleged co-conspirator in this litigation.
8
9
10
11
WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that this Court issue the Proposed
Order.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: September 10, 2013.
SUSMAN GODFREY LLP
STEVEN G. SKLAVER
12
13
By: /s/ Steven G. Sklaver
STEVEN G. SKLAVER
14
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SB LIQUIDATION TRUST
15
16
Dated: September 10, 2013.
17
18
19
20
21
22
PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
JOHN M. GRENFELL (CA Bar No. 88500)
john.grenfell@pillsburylaw.com
JACOB R. SORENSEN (CA Bar No. 209134)
jake.sorensen@pillsburylaw.com
FUSAE NARA (pro hac vice)
fusae.nara@pillsburylaw.com
ANDREW D. LANPHERE (CA Bar No. 191479)
andrew.lanphere@pillsburylaw.com
Four Embarcadero Center, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 983-1000
Facsimile: (415) 983-1200
23
By: /s/ Jacob R. Sorensen
JACOB R. SORENSEN
24
Attorneys for Defendants
SHARP CORPORATION and
SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
25
26
27
28
-22861196v1/012072
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827
1
2
Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the
filing of this document has been obtained from each of the above signatories.
3
4
5
6
[PROPOSED] ORDER
The Court having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause
appearing therefore, orders as follows:
1.
All claims asserted by SB Liquidation Trust against Sharp Corporation and
7
Sharp Electronics Corporation in the underlying action are hereby dismissed with prejudice
8
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2); and
9
2.
Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
Dated Entered: __________________
9/10/13
_______________________________
The Honorable Susan Illston
District Court Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-32861196v1/012072
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?