SB Liquidation Trust v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 143

ORDER by Judge Susan Illston granting (8812) Stipulation in case 3:07-md-01827-SI re Dismissal With Prejudice as to Chunghwa (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2013)

Download PDF
1 5 Marc M. Seltzer (54534) Steven G. Sklaver (237612) SUSMAN GODFREY LLP 1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 950 Los Angeles, California 90067-6029 Telephone: (310) 789-3100 Facsimile: (310) 789-3150 mseltzer@susmangodfrey.com ssklaver@susmangodfrey.com 6 [additional counsel listed on signature page] 7 Attorneys for SB Liquidation Trust 2 3 4 Allan Diamond (pro hac vice) Jim McCarthy (pro hac vice) Jason Fulton (pro hac vice) DIAMOND McCARTHY LLP 1201 Elm St., 34th Floor Dallas, Texas 75270 Telephone: (214) 389-5300 Facsimile: (214) 389-5399 adiamond@diamondmccarthy.com jmccarthy@diamondmccarthy.com jfulton@diamondmccarthy.com 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI 14 This Document Relates to: 15 Case No. 10-cv-5458 SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD. 16 SB LIQUIDATION TRUST, 13 The Honorable Susan Illston Plaintiff, 17 18 v. 19 AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al., 20 Defendants 21 22 Defendant Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. (“CPT”) and Plaintiff SB Liquidation 23 Trust (“Plaintiff”) stipulate to voluntary dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the 24 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as follows: 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS in its operative complaints, Plaintiff asserted claims under the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, as well as other state antitrust and unfair competition laws; WHEREAS, CPT denies Plaintiff’s allegations and has asserted defenses to Plaintiff’s claims; STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD. 1 2 WHEREAS pursuant to a settlement between the parties, Plaintiff is no longer pursuing these claims against CPT; 3 4 NOW, THEREFORE, CPT, by its counsel, and Plaintiff, by the undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree as follows: 5 1. Plaintiff’s claims against CPT are hereby dismissed with prejudice. 6 2. Both Plaintiff and CPT are to bear their own costs and fees. 7 3. This stipulation does not affect the rights or claims of Plaintiff against any other 8 defendant or alleged co-conspirator in the above-captioned cases. 9 IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: December 2, 2013 By: /s/ Steven G. Sklaver Marc M. Seltzer (54534) Steven G. Sklaver (237612) SUSMAN GODFREY LLP 1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 950 Los Angeles, CA 90067-6029 Telephone: (310) 789-3100 Fax: (310) 789-3150 mseltzer@susmangodfrey.com ssklaver@susmangodfrey.com Allan Diamond (pro hac vice) Jim McCarthy (pro hac vice) Jason Fulton (pro hac vice) DIAMOND McCARTHY LLP 1201 Elm St., 34th Floor Dallas, Texas 75270 Telephone: (214) 389-5300 Facsimile: (214) 389-5399 adiamond@diamondmccarthy.com jmccarthy@diamondmccarthy.com jfulton@diamondmccarthy.com Erica W. Harris SUSMAN GODFREY LLP 1000 Louisiana, Suite 5100 Houston, Texas 77002-5096 Telephone: (713) 651-9366 -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD. 1 Facsimile: (713) 654-6666 eharris@susmangodfrey.com 2 Attorneys for Plaintiff SB Liquidation Trust 3 4 Dated: December 2, 2013 By: 5 /s/ Rachel S. Brass Joel S. Sanders (SBN 107234) Rachel S. Brass (SBN 219301) Austin Schwing (SBN 211696) GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 San Francisco, CA 94105 (415) 393.8200 (Phone) (415) 393.8306 (Facsimile) 6 7 8 9 10 Counsel for Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd. 11 12 13 Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the filings of this document has been obtained from the other signatories. 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 17 Dec 3 DATED: _________________, 2013 18 19 20 The Honorable Susan Illston United States District Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?