SB Liquidation Trust v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
Filing
143
ORDER by Judge Susan Illston granting (8812) Stipulation in case 3:07-md-01827-SI re Dismissal With Prejudice as to Chunghwa (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2013)
1
5
Marc M. Seltzer (54534)
Steven G. Sklaver (237612)
SUSMAN GODFREY LLP
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 950
Los Angeles, California 90067-6029
Telephone: (310) 789-3100
Facsimile: (310) 789-3150
mseltzer@susmangodfrey.com
ssklaver@susmangodfrey.com
6
[additional counsel listed on signature page]
7
Attorneys for SB Liquidation Trust
2
3
4
Allan Diamond (pro hac vice)
Jim McCarthy (pro hac vice)
Jason Fulton (pro hac vice)
DIAMOND McCARTHY LLP
1201 Elm St., 34th Floor
Dallas, Texas 75270
Telephone: (214) 389-5300
Facsimile: (214) 389-5399
adiamond@diamondmccarthy.com
jmccarthy@diamondmccarthy.com
jfulton@diamondmccarthy.com
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI
14
This Document Relates to:
15
Case No. 10-cv-5458 SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER DISMISSING CHUNGHWA
PICTURE TUBES, LTD.
16
SB LIQUIDATION TRUST,
13
The Honorable Susan Illston
Plaintiff,
17
18
v.
19
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,
20
Defendants
21
22
Defendant Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. (“CPT”) and Plaintiff SB Liquidation
23
Trust (“Plaintiff”) stipulate to voluntary dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the
24
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as follows:
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS in its operative complaints, Plaintiff asserted claims under the
Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, as well as other state antitrust and unfair competition laws;
WHEREAS, CPT denies Plaintiff’s allegations and has asserted defenses to
Plaintiff’s claims;
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD.
1
2
WHEREAS pursuant to a settlement between the parties, Plaintiff is no longer
pursuing these claims against CPT;
3
4
NOW, THEREFORE, CPT, by its counsel, and Plaintiff, by the undersigned
counsel, stipulate and agree as follows:
5
1.
Plaintiff’s claims against CPT are hereby dismissed with prejudice.
6
2.
Both Plaintiff and CPT are to bear their own costs and fees.
7
3.
This stipulation does not affect the rights or claims of Plaintiff against any other
8
defendant or alleged co-conspirator in the above-captioned cases.
9
IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: December 2, 2013
By:
/s/ Steven G. Sklaver
Marc M. Seltzer (54534)
Steven G. Sklaver (237612)
SUSMAN GODFREY LLP
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 950
Los Angeles, CA 90067-6029
Telephone: (310) 789-3100
Fax: (310) 789-3150
mseltzer@susmangodfrey.com
ssklaver@susmangodfrey.com
Allan Diamond (pro hac vice)
Jim McCarthy (pro hac vice)
Jason Fulton (pro hac vice)
DIAMOND McCARTHY LLP
1201 Elm St., 34th Floor
Dallas, Texas 75270
Telephone: (214) 389-5300
Facsimile: (214) 389-5399
adiamond@diamondmccarthy.com
jmccarthy@diamondmccarthy.com
jfulton@diamondmccarthy.com
Erica W. Harris
SUSMAN GODFREY LLP
1000 Louisiana, Suite 5100
Houston, Texas 77002-5096
Telephone: (713) 651-9366
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD.
1
Facsimile: (713) 654-6666
eharris@susmangodfrey.com
2
Attorneys for Plaintiff SB Liquidation Trust
3
4
Dated: December 2, 2013
By:
5
/s/ Rachel S. Brass
Joel S. Sanders (SBN 107234)
Rachel S. Brass (SBN 219301)
Austin Schwing (SBN 211696)
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105
(415) 393.8200 (Phone)
(415) 393.8306 (Facsimile)
6
7
8
9
10
Counsel for Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd.
11
12
13
Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the
filings of this document has been obtained from the other signatories.
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17
Dec 3
DATED: _________________, 2013
18
19
20
The Honorable Susan Illston
United States District Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?