Shire LLC, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Incl et al v. IMPAX Laboratories, Inc. et al
Filing
130
STIPULATION AND ORDER for Waiver of Requirements for Service re 128 Stipulation filed by Shire LLC, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Pasko Rakic, Amy F.T, Arnsten, Robert D. Hunt. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge MARIA-ELENA JAMES on 11/4/11. (bjtS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
WILLIAM G. GAEDE, III (136184)
wgaede@mwe.com
275 Middlefield Road, Suite 100
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone:
(650) 815-7400
Facsimile:
(650) 815-7401
MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
JOSEPH R. ROBINSON (Pro Hac Vice)
jrobinson@mwe.com
HEATHER MOREHOUSE ETTINGER (Pro Hac Vice)
Hettinger@mwe.com
340 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10173
Telephone:
(212) 547-5509
Facsimile:
(212) 547-5444
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
WILLIAM R. ZIMMERMAN (SBN 195859)
bzimmerman@kmob.com
SHEILA N. SWAROOP (SBN 203476)
sswaroop@kmob.com
BENJAMIN A. KATZENELLENBOGEN (SBN 208527)
bkatzenellenbogen@kmob.com
2040 Main Street
Fourteenth Floor
Irvine, CA 92614
Telephone:
(949) 760-0404
Facsimile:
(949) 760-9502
Attorneys for Impax Laboratories, Inc.
THE BANCHERO LAW FIRM LLP
E. Jeffrey Banchero (SBN 93077)
ejb@bancherolaw.com
Scott R. Raber (SBN 194924)
sraber@bancherolaw.com
THE BANCHERO LAW FIRM LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone:
415.398.7000
Facsimile:
415.616.7000
KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP
John L. North (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
jnorth@kasowitz.com
Jeffrey J. Toney (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
jtoney@kasowitz.com
Laura Fahey Fritts (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
lfritts@kasowitz.com
Jonathan D. Olinger (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
jolinger@kasowitz.com
Norman E.B. Minnear (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
jminnear@kasowitz.com
1360 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 1150
Atlanta, GA 30309
Telephone:
404.260.6080
Facsimile:
404.260.6081
Attorneys for Defendants, Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,
Watson Laboratories, Inc.—Florida,
Watson Pharma, Inc., and Anda, Inc.
28
DM_US 30654593-1.085199. 0893
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SHIRE LLC, SUPERNUS
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., AMY F.T.
ARNSTEN, PH.D., PASKO RAKIC,
M.D., and ROBERT D. HUNT, M.D.,
Case No. 10-CV-05467-RS (MEJ)
STIPULATION FOR WAIVER OF
REQUIREMENT FOR SERVICE OF
PLAINTIFFS’ INFRINGEMENT
CONTENTIONS ON ALL PARTIES
Plaintiffs,
v.
IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC.,
WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
WATSON LABORATORIES, INC.—
FLORIDA, WATSON PHARMA, INC.,
and ANDA, INC.,
Defendants.
12
13
14
Shire LLC, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Amy F.T. Arnsten, Ph.D., Pasko Rakic, M.D.
15
and Robert D. Hunt, M.D. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and Impax Laboratories, Inc. (“Defendant
16
Impax”), Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc.- Florida, Watson Pharma, Inc.,
17
and Anda, Inc. (collectively, “Watson Defendants”; Plaintiffs and Defendants, collectively “Parties”)
18
hereby submit this stipulated request for an Order granting a waiver of the requirement under Fed. R.
19
Civ. P. 5(a)(1)(C) and Patent Local Rule 3-1 in connection with service of Plaintiffs’ Infringement
20
Contentions.
21
Plaintiffs’ Infringement Contentions as to Defendant Impax and as to Watson Defendants,
22
both of which are due on Thursday November 3, 2011, each contains Highly Confidential
23
Information of the respective defendant. Therefore, the Parties have agreed that Plaintiffs shall serve
24
the Infringement Contentions as to Defendant Impax only on Defendant Impax’s counsel, and that
25
Plaintiffs shall serve the Infringement Contentions as to Watson Defendants only on Watson
26
Defendants’ counsel. The Parties agree that Plaintiffs shall not serve the Infringement Contentions
27
as to Defendant Impax on Watson Defendants’ counsel, and that Plaintiffs shall not serve the
28
Infringement Contentions as to Watson Defendants on Defendant Impax’s counsel. The Parties
DM_US 30654593-1.085199.0893
-1-
STIP RE WAIVER OF SERVICE OF PLTFS’
INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS ON ALL PARTIES
CASE NO. 10-CV-5467 RS (MEJ)
1
therefore hereby submit this stipulated request that the requirement under Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a)(1)(C)
2
and Patent Local Rule 3-1, that discovery papers be served on every party, be waived.
3
SO STIPULATED this 2nd day of November 2011.
4
MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
5
6
Dated:
November 3, 2011
By:
7
/s/ William G. Gaede, III
William G. Gaede, III
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
8
9
KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
10
11
12
Dated:
November 3, 2011
By:
13
/s/ Sheila N. Swaroop
Sheila N. Swaroop
Attorneys for Impax Laboratories, Inc.
14
15
KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP
16
17
18
Dated:
November 3, 2011
By:
19
/s/ Laura Fahey Fritts
Laura Fahey Fritts
Attorneys for Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,
Watson Laboratories, Inc.—Florida,
Watson Pharma, Inc., and Anda, Inc.
20
21
22
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
23
Pursuant to General Order 45.X(B), I hereby attest that concurrence has been obtained from
24
Sheila N. Swaroop and Laura Fahey Fritts indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-
25
filed document.
26
/s/ William G. Gaede, III
William G. Gaede, III
27
28
DM_US 30654593-1.085199.0893
-2-
STIP RE WAIVER OF SERVICE OF PLTFS’
INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS ON ALL PARTIES
CASE NO. 10-CV-5467 RS (MEJ)
1
-oOo-
2
Pursuant to stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS SO ORDERED. The
3
Court hereby grants a waiver of requirement under Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a)(1)(C) and Local Patent Rule
4
3-1 regarding service of Plaintiffs’ Infringement Contentions.
5
6
DATED: November 4, 2011
HONORABLE MARIA-ELENA JAMES
Chief United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DM_US 30654593-1.085199.0893
-3-
STIP RE WAIVER OF SERVICE OF PLTFS’
INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS ON ALL PARTIES
CASE NO. 10-CV-5467 RS (MEJ)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?