Shire LLC, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Incl et al v. IMPAX Laboratories, Inc. et al

Filing 130

STIPULATION AND ORDER for Waiver of Requirements for Service re 128 Stipulation filed by Shire LLC, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Pasko Rakic, Amy F.T, Arnsten, Robert D. Hunt. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge MARIA-ELENA JAMES on 11/4/11. (bjtS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP WILLIAM G. GAEDE, III (136184) wgaede@mwe.com 275 Middlefield Road, Suite 100 Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: (650) 815-7400 Facsimile: (650) 815-7401 MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP JOSEPH R. ROBINSON (Pro Hac Vice) jrobinson@mwe.com HEATHER MOREHOUSE ETTINGER (Pro Hac Vice) Hettinger@mwe.com 340 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10173 Telephone: (212) 547-5509 Facsimile: (212) 547-5444 Attorneys for Plaintiffs KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP WILLIAM R. ZIMMERMAN (SBN 195859) bzimmerman@kmob.com SHEILA N. SWAROOP (SBN 203476) sswaroop@kmob.com BENJAMIN A. KATZENELLENBOGEN (SBN 208527) bkatzenellenbogen@kmob.com 2040 Main Street Fourteenth Floor Irvine, CA 92614 Telephone: (949) 760-0404 Facsimile: (949) 760-9502 Attorneys for Impax Laboratories, Inc. THE BANCHERO LAW FIRM LLP E. Jeffrey Banchero (SBN 93077) ejb@bancherolaw.com Scott R. Raber (SBN 194924) sraber@bancherolaw.com THE BANCHERO LAW FIRM LLP Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: 415.398.7000 Facsimile: 415.616.7000 KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP John L. North (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) jnorth@kasowitz.com Jeffrey J. Toney (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) jtoney@kasowitz.com Laura Fahey Fritts (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) lfritts@kasowitz.com Jonathan D. Olinger (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) jolinger@kasowitz.com Norman E.B. Minnear (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) jminnear@kasowitz.com 1360 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 1150 Atlanta, GA 30309 Telephone: 404.260.6080 Facsimile: 404.260.6081 Attorneys for Defendants, Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc.—Florida, Watson Pharma, Inc., and Anda, Inc. 28 DM_US 30654593-1.085199. 0893 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 SHIRE LLC, SUPERNUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., AMY F.T. ARNSTEN, PH.D., PASKO RAKIC, M.D., and ROBERT D. HUNT, M.D., Case No. 10-CV-05467-RS (MEJ) STIPULATION FOR WAIVER OF REQUIREMENT FOR SERVICE OF PLAINTIFFS’ INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS ON ALL PARTIES Plaintiffs, v. IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., WATSON LABORATORIES, INC.— FLORIDA, WATSON PHARMA, INC., and ANDA, INC., Defendants. 12 13 14 Shire LLC, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Amy F.T. Arnsten, Ph.D., Pasko Rakic, M.D. 15 and Robert D. Hunt, M.D. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and Impax Laboratories, Inc. (“Defendant 16 Impax”), Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc.- Florida, Watson Pharma, Inc., 17 and Anda, Inc. (collectively, “Watson Defendants”; Plaintiffs and Defendants, collectively “Parties”) 18 hereby submit this stipulated request for an Order granting a waiver of the requirement under Fed. R. 19 Civ. P. 5(a)(1)(C) and Patent Local Rule 3-1 in connection with service of Plaintiffs’ Infringement 20 Contentions. 21 Plaintiffs’ Infringement Contentions as to Defendant Impax and as to Watson Defendants, 22 both of which are due on Thursday November 3, 2011, each contains Highly Confidential 23 Information of the respective defendant. Therefore, the Parties have agreed that Plaintiffs shall serve 24 the Infringement Contentions as to Defendant Impax only on Defendant Impax’s counsel, and that 25 Plaintiffs shall serve the Infringement Contentions as to Watson Defendants only on Watson 26 Defendants’ counsel. The Parties agree that Plaintiffs shall not serve the Infringement Contentions 27 as to Defendant Impax on Watson Defendants’ counsel, and that Plaintiffs shall not serve the 28 Infringement Contentions as to Watson Defendants on Defendant Impax’s counsel. The Parties DM_US 30654593-1.085199.0893 -1- STIP RE WAIVER OF SERVICE OF PLTFS’ INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS ON ALL PARTIES CASE NO. 10-CV-5467 RS (MEJ) 1 therefore hereby submit this stipulated request that the requirement under Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a)(1)(C) 2 and Patent Local Rule 3-1, that discovery papers be served on every party, be waived. 3 SO STIPULATED this 2nd day of November 2011. 4 MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 5 6 Dated: November 3, 2011 By: 7 /s/ William G. Gaede, III William G. Gaede, III Attorneys for Plaintiffs 8 9 KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP 10 11 12 Dated: November 3, 2011 By: 13 /s/ Sheila N. Swaroop Sheila N. Swaroop Attorneys for Impax Laboratories, Inc. 14 15 KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP 16 17 18 Dated: November 3, 2011 By: 19 /s/ Laura Fahey Fritts Laura Fahey Fritts Attorneys for Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc.—Florida, Watson Pharma, Inc., and Anda, Inc. 20 21 22 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 23 Pursuant to General Order 45.X(B), I hereby attest that concurrence has been obtained from 24 Sheila N. Swaroop and Laura Fahey Fritts indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e- 25 filed document. 26 /s/ William G. Gaede, III William G. Gaede, III 27 28 DM_US 30654593-1.085199.0893 -2- STIP RE WAIVER OF SERVICE OF PLTFS’ INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS ON ALL PARTIES CASE NO. 10-CV-5467 RS (MEJ) 1 -oOo- 2 Pursuant to stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS SO ORDERED. The 3 Court hereby grants a waiver of requirement under Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a)(1)(C) and Local Patent Rule 4 3-1 regarding service of Plaintiffs’ Infringement Contentions. 5 6 DATED: November 4, 2011 HONORABLE MARIA-ELENA JAMES Chief United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DM_US 30654593-1.085199.0893 -3- STIP RE WAIVER OF SERVICE OF PLTFS’ INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS ON ALL PARTIES CASE NO. 10-CV-5467 RS (MEJ)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?