Nazomi Communications Inc v. Samsung Telecommunications Inc et al

Filing 60

ORDER to continue CMC re 39 Stipulation filed by Nazomi Communications Inc. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 3/11/2011. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2011)

Nazomi Communications Inc v. Samsung Telecommunications Inc et al

Doc. 60

Case3:10-cv-05545-CRB Document39-1

Filed03/10/11 Page1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

PEPPER HAMILTON, LLP Harry P. Weitzel (CA BAR NO. 149934) [e-mail] 4 Park Plaza, Suite 1200 Irvine, California 92614-5955 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] William D. Belanger (MA Bar No. 657184) [e-mail] James M. Wodarski (MA Bar No. 627036) [e-mail] Matthew D. Durell (GA Bar No. 142061) [e-mail] David A. Loo (MA Bar No. 669305) [e-mail] All admitted pro hac vice 125 High Street 15th Floor, Oliver Street Tower Boston, Massachusetts 02110 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

NAZOMI COMMUNICATIONS, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Nazomi Communications, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Samsung Telecommunications, Inc., et al. Defendants. Case No. 3:10-cv-05545-CRB [PROPOSED] ORDER ADOPTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES PENDING RESOLUTION OF THE PARTIES' JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO RELATE CASES

Before the Court is the parties stipulation to continue certain initial case management deadlines pending resolution of the parties' joint administrative motion to relate cases. PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, the Court
1.

Dockets.Justia.com

Case3:10-cv-05545-CRB Document39-1

Filed03/10/11 Page2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6

ORDERS as follows: 1. the deadline for the parties to submit their joint case management

statement and the March 18, 2011 Initial Case Management Conference shall be continued until after Judge Fogel rules on the pending Motion to Relate Cases; 2. in the event the Motion to Relate Cases is denied, the parties shall,

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

within five days of entry of an order denying that motion, file a joint request for issuance of a notice re-setting the date for the Initial Case Management Conference; 3. the parties shall further meet and confer pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.

26(f) and submit their joint case management statement in accordance with the deadlines established by that notice; and 4. the requested continuance will not alter the substantive or procedural

rights of the parties or the deadlines for the Defendants to answer, plead, or otherwise respond to Nazomi's complaint.
S
S DISTRICT TE C TA

20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Nazomi Communications, Inc. vs. Samsung Telecommunications, Inc., et al. Case No. 3:10-cv-05545-CRB

UNIT ED

19

RT U O

DATED:_____________________ March 11, 2011

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

2

A

C

LI

FO

harles Judge C

R. Brey

er

R NIA

BY:_________________________________________ Hon. Charles R. Breyer ED DER UnitedIStates O OR Judge S S District TI
NO

RT

H