Hewlett-Packard Company v. Epson Imaging Devices Corporation et al

Filing 21

ORDER RDER REGARDING SCHEDULING by Epson Electronics America, Inc., Epson Imaging Devices Corporation. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

MELVIN R. GOLDMAN (CA SBN 34097)
[e-mail]
STEPHEN P. FRECCERO (CA SBN 131093)
[e-mail]
DEREK F. FORAN (CA SBN 224569)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.268.7522
Attorneys for Defendants
EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION
and EPSON ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

12
13
14
15

IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Master File No. M:07-1827 SI
MDL No. 1827

This Document Relates to:
Individual Case No. 10 CV 5577 SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING
SCHEDULING

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY,

Individual Case No. 10 CV 5577 SI

16
17

Plaintiff,

18
19
20
21

v.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING
SCHEDULING

EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION
and EPSON ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Defendants.

22
23
24
25
26
27

WHEREAS, plaintiff Hewlett-Packard Company (“HP”) filed the above captioned lawsuit
on December 6, 2010 in United States District Court, Northern District of California;
WHEREAS, on March 31, 2011, the Court entered a stipulated order waiving service of
the Complaint for Defendants and extending the time within which the Defendants must move
against, answer, or otherwise respond to HP’s Complaint to June 28, 2011 (see Dkt No. 18);

28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING
CASE NO. 10 CV 5577; M: 07-1827
sf-3010916

1

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a), to extend the time
within which the Defendants must move against, answer or otherwise response to HP’s
Complaint;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the
undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, HP, on the one hand, and Defendants
on the other hand, as follows:
1.

Defendants will have until August 12, 2011, to move against, answer or otherwise

respond to HP’s Complaint.
2.

If HP files an Amended Complaint before August 12, 2011, Defendants will have

45 days from the date the Amended Complaint is filed in the ECF to move against, answer or
otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint.
3.

Entering into this stipulation does not effect a waiver of any defense under Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 12. This stipulation does not constitute a waiver of any challenge to
personal jurisdiction by either Defendant.

15
16

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

17

By:

Dated: June 22, 2011

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

/s/ Lester Houtz
Fred Bartlit, Jr.
Mark E. Ferguson
Karma Giulianelli
Lester Houtz
Andre Pauka
Dan Brody
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
BARTLIT BECK HERMAN PALENCHAR
& SCOTT LLP
1899 Wynkoop Street, Suite 800
Denver, CO 80202
[phone]
[phone] (Fax)
Counsel for Plaintiff Hewlett-Packard
Company

26
27
28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING
CASE NO. 10 CV 5577; M: 07-1827
sf-3010916

2

By:

1

/s/ Derek F. Foran
Melvin Goldman (CA SB NO. 34097)
Stephen P. Freccero (CA SB NO.
131093)
Derek F. Foran (CA SB NO. 224569)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
[phone]
[phone] (Fax)

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Counsel for Defendants Epson Imaging
Devices Corporation and Epson
Electronics America, Inc.

9
10
11
12

Attestation: The filer of this document attests that the concurrence of the other signatories thereto

13

has been obtained.

14
15

IT IS SO ORDERED.

16

6/23/11

17

_______________________________
Hon. Susan Illston
United States District Judge

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING
CASE NO. 10 CV 5577; M: 07-1827
sf-3010916

3