Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. v. Cohesion Freight (HK) Limited

Filing 42

ORDER re 41 Stipulation Conditional Dismissal with Prejudice filed by Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 3/11/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2012)

Case3:10-cv-05585-CRB Document41 Filed01/10/12 Page1 of 2

1
2
3
4

ERICH P. WISE (Bar No. 63219)
FLYNN, DELICH & WISE LLP
One World Trade Center, Suite 1800
Long Beach, CA 90831
Telephone: [phone]
Telecopier: [phone]
Email:
[e-mail]

5
6
7
8

10

Attorneys for Plaintiff
MITSUI O.S.K. LINES, LTD.

11
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
343 SANSOME STREET, SUITE 540
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104
[phone]

FLYNN, DELICH & WISE LLP

9

CONTE C. CICALA (Bar No. 173554)
FLYNN, DELICH & WISE LLP
343 Sansome Street, Suite 540
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
[phone]
Telecopier: [phone]
Email:
[e-mail]

12
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
16

MITSUI O.S.K. LINES, LTD.
Plaintiff,

17
18
19
20
21
22

vs.
COHESION FREIGHT (HK) LIMITED and
DOES 1 through 20,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: CV 10 5585 CRB
STIPULATED CONDITIONAL
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE;
PROPOSED ORDER THEREON

STIPULATED CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

23
Plaintiff MITSUI O.S.K. LINES, LTD and defendant COHESION FREIGHT (HK)
24
25

LIMITED hereby stipulate through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action

26

should be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). Such dismissal is

27

subject to the settlement agreement between the parties and is effective and conditioned upon all

28
_______________________________________________________________________________
-1STIPULATED CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON
Case No.: CV 10 5585 CRB

Case3:10-cv-05585-CRB Document41 Filed01/10/12 Page2 of 2

1

conditions of settlement being satisfied, and further that this action may be reinstated if they are

2

not, and that this Court retains personal and subject matter jurisdiction to vacate the dismissal and

3

to preside over a reinstated action, if applicable, and as otherwise necessary to enforce the terms of

4

settlement and consistent herewith. The parties respectfully request that this document supersede

5
the Order of Dismissal filed by this Court on December 14, 2011.
6
7

DATED: January 9, 2012

8

/s/
By: __________________________
Erich P. Wise
Conte C. Cicala
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MITSUI O.S.K. LINES, LTD.

9
10
11
12
13

DATED: January 9, 2012

14

CHALOS & CO., PC
/s/ (pursuant to electronic authority)
By: __________________________
George Chalos
Attorneys for Defendant
COHESION FREIGHT (HK) LIMITED

15
16
17
18
19

[PROPOSED] ORDER

20
21

Pursuant to stipulation and good cause having been shown, IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
January 11, 2012
DATED: ___________________

NO

28

yer

s R. Bre

RT

harle
Judge C

R NIA

27

ED

RDER
________________________________
IS SO O
IT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
FO

26

LI

25

RT
U
O

S

24

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

H

_______________________________________________________________________________
ER
-2C
N
STIPULATED CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDERF
THEREON
D IS T IC T O
Case No.: CV 10 5585 CRB
R

A

23

UNIT
ED

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
343 SANSOME STREET, SUITE 540
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104
[phone]

FLYNN, DELICH & WISE LLP

FLYNN, DELICH & WISE LLP