Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. v. Centurion Logistics Management et al
Filing
88
ORDER granting 51 First MOTION for Default Judgment by the Clerk as to Centurion Logistics Services Limited filed by Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 01/25/2012. (sclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2012)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
MITSUI O.S.K. LINES, LTD.,
8
9
Plaintiff,
v.
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
12
13
ALLIED TRANSPORT SYSTEM (USA),
INC.; CENTURION LOGISTICS
MANAGEMENT; CENTURION LOGISTICS
SERVICES, LTD.; UNION LOGISTICS,
INC.; and DOES 1 through 20,
14
Defendants.
15
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 10-5586 SC
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S
APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF
DEFAULT
This Court now considers for the second time an application
17
for entry of default filed by Plaintiff Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.
18
("Mitsui"), concerning Defendant Centurion Logistics Services, Ltd.
19
("CLS").
20
the Court ORDERS the Clerk of the Court to enter default against
21
Defendant Centurion Logistics Services, Ltd.
22
ECF No. 51 ("Appl.").
For the reasons set forth below,
The Court addressed this Application in an earlier Order.
ECF
23
No. 68 ("Order").
There, the Court expressed concerns about the
24
adequacy of service upon Defendant, id. at 3, whom Mitsui alleges
25
to be a foreign business, id. at 2.
26
from the Federal Maritime Commission listing Washington
27
International Insurance Company ("WIIC") as CLS's agent for service
28
of process.
Mitsui has supplied a printout
ECF No. 65 ("FMC printout").
The FMC printout lists
1
an Itasca, Illinois, address for WIIC, and further states that if
2
CLS's designated agent cannot be served due to, among other things,
3
"unavailability," "the Secretary of the Federal Maritime Commission
4
will be deemed to be [CLS's] legal agent for service of process."
5
The Court previously noted that while the FMC printout gives
6
an Itasca address for WIIC, Mitsui served WIIC in Schaumburg,
7
Illinois.
8
Mitsui's application and ordered Mitsui to file a declaration
9
explaining the discrepancy within fifteen days of the Order.
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
Order at 3.
Accordingly, the Court deferred ruling on
Id.
at 4.
11
Ten days later, Mitsui's counsel filed a declaration
12
explaining that WIIC moved from Itasca to Schaumburg sometime
13
before Mitsui's process server first attempted to effect service.
14
ECF No. 79 ("Cicala Decl.") ¶ 6.
15
the move, attempted service only at WIIC's Schaumburg address.
16
There, WIIC refused service.
17
CLS through the FMC, which also refused service.
18
Mitsui's counsel then attempted to confirm WIIC's address by
19
consulting the website for the State of California's Department of
20
Insurance, which provided the same Schaumburg address where WIIC
21
had initially refused service.
22
the process server to make a second attempt in Schaumburg; this
23
time, WIIC accepted service.
24
service asserting that a copy of the summons and operative
25
complaint were mailed to WIIC at their Schaumburg address on
26
September 26, 2011.
27
///
28
///
The process server, knowing about
Id.
Id.
Mitsui then attempted to serve
Id. ¶ 8.
Id. ¶ 9.
Mitsui's counsel directed
Mitsui has filed a proof of
Id. (citing ECF No. 66).
2
Id. ¶ 7.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(h),1 the Court
1
2
finds that, by serving CLS's designated agent for service of
3
process and mailing to the agent a copy of the summons and
4
operative complaint, Mitsui perfected service on CLS on September
5
26, 2011.
6
within the 21 days provided by Rule 12.
7
finds, pursuant to Rule 55(a), that CLS has failed to plead or
8
otherwise defend.2
CLS has not served any responsive pleadings or motions
Accordingly, the Court
For the foregoing reasons, the Court hereby ORDERS the Clerk
9
11
Services, Ltd.
S
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
R NIA
14
UNIT
ED
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
12
Dated: January 25, 2012
15
onti
UNITED STATES amuel C
Judge S DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
19
FO
A
H
ER
LI
16
RT
United States District Court
of the Court to enter default against Defendant Centurion Logistics
NO
For the Northern District of California
10
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Rule 4(h) provides, in pertinent part, that a foreign
corporation, partnership, or association may be served in a
judicial district of the United States "by delivering a copy of the
summons and of the complaint to an officer, a managing or general
agent, or any other agent authorized by appointment or by law to
receive service of process and — if the agent is one authorized by
statute and the statute so requires — by also mailing a copy of
each to the defendant."
2
Rule 55(a) provides: "When a party against whom a judgment for
affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise
defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the
clerk must enter the party's default."
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?