Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. v. U.S. Pacific Transport, Inc.

Filing 11

ORDER Case Management Statement due by 7/21/2011. Case Management Conference set for 7/28/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom B, 15th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 5/26/2011. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2011)

Case3:10-cv-05590-MEJ Document10

1
2
3
4

Filed05/26/11 Page1 of 3

ERICH P. WISE (Bar No. 63219)
FLYNN, DELICH & WISE LLP
One World Trade Center, Suite 1800
Long Beach, CA 90831
Telephone:
[phone]
Telecopier: [phone]
Email:
[e-mail]

5
6
7
8

10

Attorneys for Plaintiff
MITSUI O.S.K. LINES, LTD.

11
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
343 SANSOME STREET, SUITE 540
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104
[phone]

FLYNN, DELICH & WISE LLP

9

CONTE C. CICALA (Bar No. 173554)
FLYNN, DELICH & WISE LLP
343 Sansome Street, Suite 540
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
[phone]
Telecopier: [phone]
Email:
[e-mail]

12
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
U.S. PACIFIC TRANSPORT, INC., and DOES)
)
1 through 20,
)
)
Defendants.
)
MITSUI O.S.K. LINES, LTD.

Case No.: CV 10 5590 MEJ
JOINT CMC STATEMENT AND
STIPLATION/REQUEST FOR
CONTINUANCE OF CMC AND OTHER
LITIGATION DEADLINES
Date: June 2, 2011
Time: 8:30 a.m.

Plaintiff MITSUI O.S.K. LINES, LTD. (“MOL”) and Defendant U.S. PACIFIC

23
TRANSPORT, INC. (“USPTI”) have previously requested, and this court granted, a continuance
24
25

of litigation-related deadlines so that they may engage in settlement discussions regarding this

26

case. As a consequence of those discussions, the parties are very close to reaching a settlement

27
28
_______________________________________________________________________________
-1JOINT CMC STATEMENT - STIPULATION
Case No.: CV 10 5590 MEJ

Case3:10-cv-05590-MEJ Document10

Filed05/26/11 Page2 of 3

1

that will result in a dismissal of this action in its entirety, and therefore respectfully request a

2

further 45-60 day continuance of the CMC and all other pending deadlines.

3
4

Such postponement is in the interest of the parties and judicial economy since such
discussions could lead to resolution of the matter and/or refinement of issues. Accordingly, they

5
respectfully request that this Court grant an extension of USPTI to and including June 30, 2011
6
7

to respond to the Amended Complaint hereunder, and to continue all other hearings and

8

deadlines in this case approximately sixty days from their current dates.

9
FLYNN, DELICH & WISE LLP

11
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
343 SANSOME STREET, SUITE 540
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104
[phone]

FLYNN, DELICH & WISE LLP

DATED: May 26, 2011
10

12

By: ____________/s/______________
Erich P. Wise
Conte C. Cicala
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MITSUI O.S.K. LINES, LTD.

13
14
15
16
17

DATED: May 26, 2011

RODRIGUEZ, O'DONNELL, GONZALEZ
& WILLIAMS, P.C.

18
19
By: _____________/s/_____________
Carlos Rodriguez
Henry Gonzalez
Attorneys for Defendant
U.S. PACIFIC TRANSPORT, INC.

20
21
22
23
24
25

[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to stipulation, and good cause having been shown, the Court orders as follows:

26
1)

USPTI shall have to and including June 30, 2011 to respond to the complaint;

27
28
_______________________________________________________________________________
-2JOINT CMC STATEMENT - STIPULATION
Case No.: CV 10 5590 MEJ

Case3:10-cv-05590-MEJ Document10

1

2)

Filed05/26/11 Page3 of 3

The last day to meet and confer re: initial disclosures, etc., and to file an ADR

2

certification and stipulation for ADR or request for ADR phone conference, is continued to: July

3

__________, 2011.

4
5

3)

The last day to file a rule 26 report, complete initial disclosures and file a case

21
management conference is continued to July ____, 2011.

6
7
8

28
The initial case management conference is continued to July ___, 2011 at 10:00

a.m., in Courtroom B, 15th Floor, San Francisco. All dates are adjusted accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
343 SANSOME STREET, SUITE 540
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104
[phone]

FLYNN, DELICH & WISE LLP

9

4)

12

May 26, 2011
Dated: _________________________

13
14
15

___________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
_______________________________________________________________________________
-3JOINT CMC STATEMENT - STIPULATION
Case No.: CV 10 5590 MEJ