Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. v. Seamaster Logistics, Inc.

Filing 203

STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Briefing Deadlines. Set/Reset Deadlines as to (196 in 3:10-cv-05591-SC) MOTION for Attorney Fees , (199 in 3:10-cv-05591-SC) MOTION for Attorney Fees , (264 in 3:11-cv-02861-SC) MOTION for Attorney Fees . Responses due by 4/26/2013. Replies due by 5/10/2013. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 04/09/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

EMARD DANOFF PORT TAMULSKI & PAETZOLD LLP
Eric Danoff (60915)
Katharine Essick (219426)
49 Stevenson Street, Suite 400
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
SEAMASTER LOGISTICS, INC. and
TOLL GLOBAL FORWARDING
(AMERICAS)

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

MITSUI O.S.K. LINES, LTD.,

12
13

Case No.: 10 CV 5591 SC (JSC)

Plaintiff,

STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF
BRIEFING DEADLINES; [PROPOSED]
ORDER

vs.

14

SEAMASTER LOGISTICS, INC., et al.,

15

Defendants,

16

MITSUI O.S.K. LINES, LTD.,

17
18

Case No.: 11 CV 2861 SC (JSC)

Plaintiff,
vs.

19

SEAMASTER LOGISTICS, INC., et al.,

20

Defendants,

21
22

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.

23
24
25
26
27
28
EMARD DANOFF PORT
TAMULSKI & PAETZOLD LLP
49 Stevenson Street
Suite 400
San Francisco, CA 94105

-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 10 CV 5591 SC (JSC) and Case No. 11 CV 2861 SC (JSC) (Consolidated)

1

Plaintiff Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. (“MOL”) and defendants SeaMaster Logistics, Inc.,

2

Toll Global Forwarding (Americas) Inc., formerly known as Summit Logistics International, Inc.

3

(collectively “SeaMaster”) stipulate to an order changing time that will extend the briefing

4

deadlines of their respective Motions for Attorneys Fees and Bills of Costs.

5

Whereas,

6

1.

On April 4, 2013, MOL filed a Motion for Attorney Fees and Bill of Costs in

7

Case No. CV 11 2861 SC and SeaMaster filed a Motion for Attorney Fees and

8

Bill of Costs in Case No. CV 10 5591 SC;

9

2.

Under local rule, the current date for filing an opposition to each motion is April

10

18, 2013 and the current date for filing a reply in support of each motion is seven

11

days later (April 25, 2013);

12

3.

The current briefing schedule has resulted in significant calendar conflicts for

13

SeaMaster’s counsel, including that she will be totally unavailable from April 10

14

through April 17, one day before SeaMaster’s opposition and objections must be

15

filed;

16

4.

Counsel have met and conferred and have agreed to the following changes that do
not conflict with their schedules:

17
18

Current Date

19

Proposed Date

20

Oppositions/Objections

April 18, 2013

April 26, 2013

21

Replies

April 25, 2013

May 10, 2013

22
23

5.

There have been two prior stipulated requests to enlarge time in this case (a

24

November 2011 request to continue a mediation deadline to allow the parties to

25

pursue more discovery, and a March 2012 request for more time for Defendants

26

to respond to the Second Amended Complaint).

27
28
EMARD DANOFF PORT
TAMULSKI & PAETZOLD LLP
49 Stevenson Street
Suite 400
San Francisco, CA 94105

6.

The proposed changes to the briefing schedule will not affect the hearing date of
May 24, 2013; and
-2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 10 CV 5591 SC (JSC) and Case No. 11 CV 2861 SC (JSC) (Consolidated)

1
2
3
4

7.

The proposed changes to the briefing schedule will not reduce the amount of time
set forth in local rule for the Court to consider the briefs before the hearing date.

SO STIPULATED.
DATED: April 8, 2013

5

EMARD DANOFF PORT TAMULSKI & PAETZOLD LLP
Eric Danoff
Katharine Essick

6
By

/s/ Katharine Essick
Katharine Essick
Attorneys for Defendants
SEAMASTER LOGISTICS, INC. and TOLL GLOBAL
FORWARDING (AMERICAS) INC.

7
8
9
10

DATED: April 8, 2013

11

FLYNN DELICH & WISE LLP
Erich P. Wise
Conte C. Ciala

12
By

/s/ Erich P. Wise
Erich P. Wise
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MITSUI O.S.K. LINES, LTD.

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

ER

H

27

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

28
EMARD DANOFF PORT
TAMULSKI & PAETZOLD LLP
49 Stevenson Street
Suite 400
San Francisco, CA 94105

R NIA

onti

FO

amuel C

Judge S

RT

26

NO

25

United States District Court Judge

LI

24

Date: 04/09/2013

UNIT
ED

23

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

RT
U
O

S

22

A

21

-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 10 CV 5591 SC (JSC) and Case No. 11 CV 2861 SC (JSC) (Consolidated)

C