Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. v. Seamaster Logistics, Inc.
Filing
261
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 10/21/2015. (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2015)
Case 3:11-cv-02861-SC Document 350-1 Filed 10/20/15 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
(562) 437-7555
JAMES B. NEBEL/SBN 69626
jamesn@fdw-law.com
FLYNN, DELICH & WISE LLP
505 Montgomery Street, 11th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
(415) 693-5566
Facsimile:
(415) 693-0410
CONTE C. CICALA/SBN 173554
Conte.Cicala@clydeco.us
CLYDE & CO. US LLP
101 Second Street, 24th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone:
(415) 365-9800
Facsimile:
(415) 365-9801
10
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
ONE WORLD TRADE CENTER, SUITE 1800
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 908031-1800
(562) 435-2626
FLYNN, DELICH & WISE LLP
9
ERICH P. WISE/SBN 63219
erichw@fdw-law.com
ALISA MANASANTIVONGS/SBN 260227
alisam@fdw-law.com
FLYNN, DELICH & WISE LLP
One World Trade Center, Suite 1800
Long Beach, CA 90831-1800
Telephone:
(562) 435-2626
Facsimile:
11
12
13
14
15
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MITSUI O.S.K. LINES, LTD.
16
17
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
MITSUI O.S.K. LINES, LTD.
)
)
vs.
)
)
SEAMASTER LOGISTICS, INC.; SUMMIT )
LOGISTICS INTERNATIONAL, INC.;
)
KESCO CONTAINER LINE, INC.; KESCO )
SHIPPING, INC., and DOES 1 through 20,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
Case Nos.:
Plaintiff,
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
Date:
Time:
Courtroom:
Judge:
27
28
11-02861 SC
10-05591 SC
[Consolidated]
//
1
[Proposed] Judgment
November 13, 2015
10:00 a.m.
1
Hon. Samuel Conti
Case 3:11-cv-02861-SC Document 350-1 Filed 10/20/15 Page 2 of 3
In accordance with its Order on Remand from the Ninth Circuit (Doc. No. 347, 10/05/15,
1
2
in Case No. 11-cv-2861-SC), the Court enters judgment as follows. “MOL” refers to plaintiff
3
Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.
4
1.
On MOL’s claims for intentional and negligent misrepresentation, the Court
5
6
7
enters judgment in favor of MOL and against defendant SeaMaster Logistics, Inc. in the amount
of $1,151,205.
2.
8
10
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
ONE WORLD TRADE CENTER, SUITE 1800
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 908031-1800
(562) 435-2626
FLYNN, DELICH & WISE LLP
9
On MOL’s claims for intentional and negligent misrepresentation, the Court
enters judgment in favor of MOL and against defendant Toll Global Forwarding (Americas) Inc.
(formerly known as Summit Logistics International, Inc.) in the amount of $2,122,374.
11
3.
12
The Court dismisses with prejudice MOL’s claims against defendants SeaMaster
13
Logistics, Inc. and Toll Global Forwarding (Americas) Inc. (formerly known as Summit
14
Logistics International, Inc.) under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18
15
U.S.C. Sections 1962 et seq.
16
4.
In addition to the amount stated in paragraph 2, on MOL’s claims for intentional
17
18
and negligent misrepresentation and conspiracy, the Court enters judgment in favor of MOL and
19
against defendant Toll Global Forwarding (Americas) Inc. (formerly known as Summit Logistics
20
International, Inc.) jointly and severally with defendant Kesco Container Line, Inc., in the
21
amount of $242,649.
22
5.
The Court’s following judgments stated in its Order Granting Summit Logistics
23
24
International Inc.’s Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment (Doc. No. 309, 07/18/13, in Case
25
No. 11-cv-2861-SC) remain undisturbed: (a) judgment in favor of MOL against defendant Kesco
26
Container Line, Inc.; and (b) judgment in favor of Kesco Shipping, Inc. against MOL.
27
//
28
2
[Proposed] Judgment
Case 3:11-cv-02861-SC Document 350-1 Filed 10/20/15 Page 3 of 3
1
2
6.
The Court’s judgment in Case No. 10-cv-05991-SC remains undisturbed.
IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED.
3
4
Dated: October
, 2015
____________________________________
Samuel Conti
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
10
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
ONE WORLD TRADE CENTER, SUITE 1800
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 908031-1800
(562) 435-2626
FLYNN, DELICH & WISE LLP
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
[Proposed] Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?