Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. v. Seamaster Logistics, Inc.

Filing 261

JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 10/21/2015. (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2015)

Download PDF
Case 3:11-cv-02861-SC Document 350-1 Filed 10/20/15 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 (562) 437-7555 JAMES B. NEBEL/SBN 69626 jamesn@fdw-law.com FLYNN, DELICH & WISE LLP 505 Montgomery Street, 11th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 693-5566 Facsimile: (415) 693-0410 CONTE C. CICALA/SBN 173554 Conte.Cicala@clydeco.us CLYDE & CO. US LLP 101 Second Street, 24th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 365-9800 Facsimile: (415) 365-9801 10 ATTORNEYS AT LAW ONE WORLD TRADE CENTER, SUITE 1800 LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 908031-1800 (562) 435-2626 FLYNN, DELICH & WISE LLP 9 ERICH P. WISE/SBN 63219 erichw@fdw-law.com ALISA MANASANTIVONGS/SBN 260227 alisam@fdw-law.com FLYNN, DELICH & WISE LLP One World Trade Center, Suite 1800 Long Beach, CA 90831-1800 Telephone: (562) 435-2626 Facsimile: 11 12 13 14 15 Attorneys for Plaintiff MITSUI O.S.K. LINES, LTD. 16 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 MITSUI O.S.K. LINES, LTD. ) ) vs. ) ) SEAMASTER LOGISTICS, INC.; SUMMIT ) LOGISTICS INTERNATIONAL, INC.; ) KESCO CONTAINER LINE, INC.; KESCO ) SHIPPING, INC., and DOES 1 through 20, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case Nos.: Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT Date: Time: Courtroom: Judge: 27 28 11-02861 SC 10-05591 SC [Consolidated] // 1 [Proposed] Judgment November 13, 2015 10:00 a.m. 1 Hon. Samuel Conti Case 3:11-cv-02861-SC Document 350-1 Filed 10/20/15 Page 2 of 3 In accordance with its Order on Remand from the Ninth Circuit (Doc. No. 347, 10/05/15, 1 2 in Case No. 11-cv-2861-SC), the Court enters judgment as follows. “MOL” refers to plaintiff 3 Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. 4 1. On MOL’s claims for intentional and negligent misrepresentation, the Court 5 6 7 enters judgment in favor of MOL and against defendant SeaMaster Logistics, Inc. in the amount of $1,151,205. 2. 8 10 ATTORNEYS AT LAW ONE WORLD TRADE CENTER, SUITE 1800 LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 908031-1800 (562) 435-2626 FLYNN, DELICH & WISE LLP 9 On MOL’s claims for intentional and negligent misrepresentation, the Court enters judgment in favor of MOL and against defendant Toll Global Forwarding (Americas) Inc. (formerly known as Summit Logistics International, Inc.) in the amount of $2,122,374. 11 3. 12 The Court dismisses with prejudice MOL’s claims against defendants SeaMaster 13 Logistics, Inc. and Toll Global Forwarding (Americas) Inc. (formerly known as Summit 14 Logistics International, Inc.) under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 15 U.S.C. Sections 1962 et seq. 16 4. In addition to the amount stated in paragraph 2, on MOL’s claims for intentional 17 18 and negligent misrepresentation and conspiracy, the Court enters judgment in favor of MOL and 19 against defendant Toll Global Forwarding (Americas) Inc. (formerly known as Summit Logistics 20 International, Inc.) jointly and severally with defendant Kesco Container Line, Inc., in the 21 amount of $242,649. 22 5. The Court’s following judgments stated in its Order Granting Summit Logistics 23 24 International Inc.’s Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment (Doc. No. 309, 07/18/13, in Case 25 No. 11-cv-2861-SC) remain undisturbed: (a) judgment in favor of MOL against defendant Kesco 26 Container Line, Inc.; and (b) judgment in favor of Kesco Shipping, Inc. against MOL. 27 // 28 2 [Proposed] Judgment Case 3:11-cv-02861-SC Document 350-1 Filed 10/20/15 Page 3 of 3 1 2 6. The Court’s judgment in Case No. 10-cv-05991-SC remains undisturbed. IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED. 3 4 Dated: October , 2015 ____________________________________ Samuel Conti United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 10 ATTORNEYS AT LAW ONE WORLD TRADE CENTER, SUITE 1800 LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 908031-1800 (562) 435-2626 FLYNN, DELICH & WISE LLP 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 [Proposed] Judgment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?