Finisar Corporation v. Oplink Communications Inc. et al

Filing 77

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 76 OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/6/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2012)

*E-Filed 1/6/12*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Daniel Johnson, Jr. (State Bar No. 57409)
Michael J. Lyons (State Bar No. 202284)
Dion M. Bregman (State Bar No. 208393)
Ahren C. Hsu-Hoffman (State Bar No. 250469)
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
2 Palo Alto Square
3000 El Camino Real, Suite 700
Palo Alto, CA 94306-2122
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]

8
9

Attorneys for Plaintiff
FINISAR CORPORATION

Thomas J. Friel, Jr. (SBN 80065)
COOLEY LLP
101 California Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-5800
Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Mark T. Smith (SBN 260845)
COOLEY LLP
Five Palo Alto Square
3000 El Camino Real
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Sarah J. Guske (SBN 232467)
Wayne O. Stacy (pro hac vice)
COOLEY LLP
380 Interlocken Crescent, Suite 900
Broomfield, CO 80021-8023
Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]

10
11
12
13
14

Attorneys for Defendants
OPLINK COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
and
OPTICAL COMMUNICATION
PRODUCTS, INC

15
16
17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

20
21

CASE NO. 3:10-cv-05617 RS
FINISAR CORPORATION,

22
Plaintiff,

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER

23
v.
24
25

OPLINK COMMUNICATIONS INC.,
OPTICAL COMMUNICATION
PRODUCTS, INC.,

26
Defendants.
27
28
M ORGAN , L EWIS &
B OCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
PALO ALTO

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-05617 RS

1

It is hereby stipulated between Plaintiff FINISAR CORPORATION (“Finisar”) and

2

Defendants OPLINK COMMUNICATIONS INC., OPTICAL COMMUNICATION

3

PRODUCTS, INC. (“Oplink”), by and through their respective counsel, pursuant to Federal Rule

4

of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), that the above-captioned action shall be dismissed with

5

prejudice and that the parties shall bear their own costs and attorney’s fees.

6

Dated: January 6, 2012

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

7

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

8
9

By /s/ Michael J. Lyons
Michael J. Lyons
Attorney for Plaintiff
FINISAR CORPORATION

10
11
12
13

Dated: January 6, 2012

COOLEY LLP

14
By /s/ Sarah Guske
Sarah Guske
Attorney for Defendant
OPLINK COMMUNICATIONS INC.,
OPTICAL COMMUNICATION
PRODUCTS, INC.,

15
16
17
18

FILER’S ATTESTATION

19
20
21
22
23

I, Michael J. Lyons, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to
file this Stipulation of Dismissal and [Proposed] Order. In compliance with General Order
45.X.B, I hereby attest that Sarah Guske concurs in this filing.
Dated: January 6, 2012

24
By /s/ Michael J. Lyons
Michael J. Lyons

25
26

Attorney for Plaintiff
FINISAR CORPORATION

27
28
M ORGAN , L EWIS &
B OCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
PALO ALTO

1

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-05617 RS

1
2
3

ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
That the Stipulation of Dismissal and [Proposed] Order is adopted by the Court. The

4

above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice, and the parties shall bear their own costs and

5

attorneys’ fees. The Clerk shall close the file.

6
7

1/6
Dated: ________________, 2012
HON. RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
M ORGAN , L EWIS &
B OCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
PALO ALTO

2

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-05617 RS