Rhynes et al v. Stryker Corporation et al

Filing 55

ORDER by Judge Samuel Conti granting in part and denying in part 53 Ex Parte Application. (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 8 GLORIA RHYNES, individually and on behalf of the general public, and DARRELL JENKINS, 9 Plaintiffs, 7 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 v. 11 12 13 14 STRYKER CORPORATION; STRYKER ORTHOPEDICS; and DOES 1 through 30, inclusive, Defendants. 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 10-5619 SC ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' EX PARTE MOTION FOR ENTRY OF A CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 16 17 Now before the Court is Defendants' ex parte motion for entry 18 of a scheduling order. 19 court establish a number of deadlines, including deadlines for 20 expert and fact discovery, which the Court declined to set at a 21 July 6, 2012 status conference. 22 motion, arguing that the deadlines proposed by the Defendants are 23 unnecessary and unrealistic. 24 papers, the Court remains convinced that it is too early to set the 25 discovery deadlines requested by Defendants. 26 designate their expert witnesses by January 7, 2013. 27 will hold a further case management conference on January 11, 2013 28 at 10:00 a.m., at which time the Court will set a date for trial ECF No. 53. Defendants request that the Plaintiff opposes the ex parte ECF No. 54. Having reviewed the The parties shall The Court 1 and a Daubert hearing, as well as deadlines for pre-trial motions 2 and discovery. 3 Avenue, San Francisco, California. 4 joint case management statement by January 8, 2013. The hearing will be in Courtroom 1, 450 Golden Gate The parties are to submit one 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 9 Dated: July 31, 2012 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?