Rhynes et al v. Stryker Corporation et al
Filing
55
ORDER by Judge Samuel Conti granting in part and denying in part 53 Ex Parte Application. (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2012)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
8
GLORIA RHYNES, individually and
on behalf of the general public,
and DARRELL JENKINS,
9
Plaintiffs,
7
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
v.
11
12
13
14
STRYKER CORPORATION; STRYKER
ORTHOPEDICS; and DOES 1 through
30, inclusive,
Defendants.
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 10-5619 SC
ORDER GRANTING IN PART and
DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS'
EX PARTE MOTION FOR ENTRY OF
A CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
16
17
Now before the Court is Defendants' ex parte motion for entry
18
of a scheduling order.
19
court establish a number of deadlines, including deadlines for
20
expert and fact discovery, which the Court declined to set at a
21
July 6, 2012 status conference.
22
motion, arguing that the deadlines proposed by the Defendants are
23
unnecessary and unrealistic.
24
papers, the Court remains convinced that it is too early to set the
25
discovery deadlines requested by Defendants.
26
designate their expert witnesses by January 7, 2013.
27
will hold a further case management conference on January 11, 2013
28
at 10:00 a.m., at which time the Court will set a date for trial
ECF No. 53.
Defendants request that the
Plaintiff opposes the ex parte
ECF No. 54.
Having reviewed the
The parties shall
The Court
1
and a Daubert hearing, as well as deadlines for pre-trial motions
2
and discovery.
3
Avenue, San Francisco, California.
4
joint case management statement by January 8, 2013.
The hearing will be in Courtroom 1, 450 Golden Gate
The parties are to submit one
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
9
Dated: July 31, 2012
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?