Rhynes et al v. Stryker Corporation et al

Filing 61

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 1/22/13. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 SEDGWICK LLP Mario Horwitz (State Bar No. 110965) mario.horwitz@sedgwicklaw.com James Nelson (State Bar No. 181256) james.nelson@sedgwicklaw.com 801 South Figueroa Street, 19th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017-5556 Telephone: 213.426.6900 Facsimile: 213.426.6921 Attorneys for Defendant STRYKER CORPORATION and HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 1999 HARRISON STREET, SUITE 1620 OAKLAND, CA 94612 ANTHONY & ASSOCIATES 9 12 GLORIA RHYNES and DARRELL JENKINS, 13 14 15 16 17 Case No. 3:10-cv-05619-SC STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL [AND PROPOSED ORDER] Plaintiff, v. STRYKER CORPORATION; STRYKER ORTHOPEDICS; and DOES 1 through 30, Inclusive;, Judge: Hon. Samuel Conti Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 Plaintiffs Gloria Rhynes and Darrell Jenkins, and defendants Stryker Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corp, by their respective counsel, hereby stipulate pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii), that this action be dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, each 23 party to bear its respective costs. 24 DATED: January 16, 2013 ANTHONY & ASSOCIATES 25 26 27 28 By: /s/ Steven Anthony Steven Anthony Jane Trigero Attorneys for Plaintiffs STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL [AND PROPOSED ORDER] -1- 1 DATED: January 16, 2012 Sedgwick LLP 2 3 4 By: /s/ Mario Horwitz Mario Horwitz Attorneys for Defendant Stryker Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corp 5 ER H 13 R NIA FO LI 12 onti amuel C Judge S RT 1999 HARRISON STREET, SUITE 1620 OAKLAND, CA 94612 11 IT IS NO ANTHONY & ASSOCIATES 10 S DISTRIC TC TE _________________________________ TA Honorable Samuel Conti United StatesSO ORDERED Judge RT U O 9 January 22, 2013 DATED: _______________________ A 8 and it is hereby, dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, each party to bear its respective costs. S 7 Based upon the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be, UNIT ED 6 N F D IS T IC T O R C 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL [AND PROPOSED ORDER] -2- 1 2 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER NO. 45 Pursuant to General Order No. 45 of the Northern District of California, I 3 attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the 4 other signatory to this document. 5 6 By: /s/ Steven Anthony Steven Anthony 7 8 9 11 1999 HARRISON STREET, SUITE 1620 OAKLAND, CA 94612 ANTHONY & ASSOCIATES 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL [AND PROPOSED ORDER] -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?