Rhynes et al v. Stryker Corporation et al
Filing
61
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 1/22/13. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
SEDGWICK LLP
Mario Horwitz (State Bar No. 110965)
mario.horwitz@sedgwicklaw.com
James Nelson (State Bar No. 181256)
james.nelson@sedgwicklaw.com
801 South Figueroa Street, 19th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017-5556
Telephone: 213.426.6900
Facsimile:
213.426.6921
Attorneys for Defendant STRYKER CORPORATION and
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
1999 HARRISON STREET, SUITE 1620
OAKLAND, CA 94612
ANTHONY & ASSOCIATES
9
12
GLORIA RHYNES and DARRELL JENKINS,
13
14
15
16
17
Case No. 3:10-cv-05619-SC
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL [AND
PROPOSED ORDER]
Plaintiff,
v.
STRYKER CORPORATION; STRYKER
ORTHOPEDICS; and DOES 1 through 30,
Inclusive;,
Judge:
Hon. Samuel Conti
Defendant.
18
19
20
21
22
Plaintiffs Gloria Rhynes and Darrell Jenkins, and defendants Stryker Corporation and
Howmedica Osteonics Corp, by their respective counsel, hereby stipulate pursuant to Fed. R.
Civ. P. Rule 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii), that this action be dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, each
23
party to bear its respective costs.
24
DATED: January 16, 2013
ANTHONY & ASSOCIATES
25
26
27
28
By: /s/ Steven Anthony
Steven Anthony
Jane Trigero
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL [AND PROPOSED ORDER]
-1-
1
DATED: January 16, 2012
Sedgwick LLP
2
3
4
By: /s/ Mario Horwitz
Mario Horwitz
Attorneys for Defendant Stryker Corporation and
Howmedica Osteonics Corp
5
ER
H
13
R NIA
FO
LI
12
onti
amuel C
Judge S
RT
1999 HARRISON STREET, SUITE 1620
OAKLAND, CA 94612
11
IT IS
NO
ANTHONY & ASSOCIATES
10
S DISTRIC
TC
TE
_________________________________
TA
Honorable Samuel Conti
United StatesSO ORDERED
Judge
RT
U
O
9
January 22, 2013
DATED: _______________________
A
8
and it is hereby, dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, each party to bear its respective costs.
S
7
Based upon the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be,
UNIT
ED
6
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL [AND PROPOSED ORDER]
-2-
1
2
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER NO. 45
Pursuant to General Order No. 45 of the Northern District of California, I
3
attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the
4
other signatory to this document.
5
6
By: /s/ Steven Anthony
Steven Anthony
7
8
9
11
1999 HARRISON STREET, SUITE 1620
OAKLAND, CA 94612
ANTHONY & ASSOCIATES
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL [AND PROPOSED ORDER]
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?