Siegel v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 170

ORDER by Judge Susan Illston granting (8813) Stipulation in case 3:07-md-01827-SI of Dismissal of Sharp (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

6
7
8
9
10
11
12

IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
Master Docket No. M:07-1827 SI
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
_________________________________________ MDL No. 1827
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

Individual Case No. 3:10-cv-05625 SI

ALFRED H. SIEGEL, AS TRUSTEE OF THE
CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC. LIQUIDATING
TRUST,

[PROPOSED] ORDER

13
14
15
16

Plaintiff,
v.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION,
ET AL.
Defendants.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

[Proposed] Order - 1
2536339v1/011997

MASTER FILE NO.: M-07-1827-SI
CASE NO. 3:10-05625 SI

1
2
3
4

The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing
therefore, orders as follows:
1.

All claims asserted by plaintiff Alfred H. Siegel, solely in his capacity as Trustee

of the Circuit City Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust, against defendants Sharp Corporation and Sharp
Electronics Corporation (collectively “Sharp”) are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule

5

41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

6

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

7

3.

This Order is not a dismissal of any person or entity other than Sharp.

8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11

4th
Dec
This _______ day of _______________, 2013.

12

________________________
Hon. Susan Illston
United States District Court Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[Proposed] Order - 2
2536339v1/011997

MASTER FILE NO.: M-07-1827-SI
CASE NO. 3:10-05625 SI