Siegel v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
Filing
23
ORDER by Judge Illston vacating hearing (2480) Motion submitted without argument in case 3:07-md-01827-SI; vacating hearing (17) Motion submitted without argument in case 3:10-cv-05625-SI re 22 Stipulation. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2011) Modified on 3/23/2011 (ys, COURT STAFF). (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/23/2011: # 1 Envelope) (tf, COURT STAFF).
Siegel v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
Doc. 23
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP JOEL S. SANDERS, SBN 107234, JSanders@gibsondunn.com RACHEL S. BRASS, SBN 219301, RBrass@gibsondunn.com REBECCA JUSTICE LAZARUS, SBN 227330, RJustice@gibsondunn.com SERENA G. LIU, SBN 264977, SGLiu@gibsondunn.com 555 Mission Street Suite 3000 San Francisco, California 94105-2933 Telephone: 415.393.8200 Facsimile: 415.393.8306 Attorneys for Defendant CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Document Related to Individual Case No. 3:10-cv-05625-SI _______________________________________ ALFRED H. SIEGEL, AS TRUSTEE OF THE CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC. LIQUIDATING TRUST, Plaintiff,
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI MDL No. 1827 Individual Case No. 3:10-cv-05625-SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER WAIVING ORAL ARGUMENT ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ORDER AUTHORIZING PLAINTIFFS TO SERVE CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD. THROUGH ITS U.S. COUNSEL
19 v. 20 AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, ET AL., 21 Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
The undersigned counsel, on behalf of Plaintiff Alfred H. Siegel, As Trustee of the Circuit City Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. ("Chunghwa"), request that the Court take off calendar the hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Order Authorizing Plaintiffs to Serve Defendant Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. Through Its U.S. Counsel (the "Motion") and rule based on the papers. WHEREAS Plaintiff filed the Motion on February 22, 2011 and Chunghwa filed a 1
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Waiving Oral Argument, Case No.: MDL 07-01827
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Memorandum in Opposition on March 18, 2011; WHEREAS Plaintiff and Chunghwa agree that the issue has been fully briefed; WHEREAS the Court has previously heard argument and ruled on substantially similar motions in related cases; THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Chunghwa, by their respective counsel, stipulate and agree to waive oral argument on the Motion, and submit to the Court's ruling on the papers that have been filed. The parties agree that the hearing scheduled for 9:00 a.m. on April 8, 2011 may be taken off calendar, subject to any further direction of the Court. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Respectfully submitted, DATED: March 22, 2011 By: /s/ Rachel S. Brass_____________ Joel S. Sanders, SBN 107234 Rachel S. Brass, SBN 219301 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 555 Mission Street Suite 3000 San Francisco, California 94105-2933 Telephone: (415) 393-8200 Facsimile: (415) 393-8306 Attorneys for Defendant Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. By: /s/ Kenneth S. Marks____________ Kenneth S. Marks (admitted pro hac vice) Susman Godfrey LLP 1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100 Houston, TX 77002-5096 (713) 651-9366 (713) 654-6666 kmarks@susmangodfrey.com Attorneys for Alfred H. Siegel, as Trustee of Circuit City Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust Attestation: The filer of this document attests that the concurrence of the other signatory thereto has been obtained. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3/22/11 ___________________________________ Date Entered 2
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Waiving Oral Argument, Case No.: MDL 07-01827
_________________________________________ Honorable Judge Susan Illston
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?