Siegel v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 26

ORDER Re: Extension of Time for Defendant Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. to Respond to Complaint (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2011)

Download PDF
Siegel v. AU Optronics Corporation et al Doc. 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP JOEL S. SANDERS, SBN 107234, JSanders@gibsondunn.com RACHEL S. BRASS, SBN 219301, RBrass@gibsondunn.com REBECCA JUSTICE LAZARUS, SBN 227330, RJustice@gibsondunn.com SERENA G. LIU, SBN 264977, SGLiu@gibsondunn.com 555 Mission Street Suite 3000 San Francisco, California 94105-2933 Telephone: 415.393.8200 Facsimile: 415.393.8306 Attorneys for Defendant CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Document Related to Individual Case No. 3:10-cv-05625-SI _______________________________________ ALFRED H. SIEGEL, AS TRUSTEE OF THE CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC. LIQUIDATING TRUST, Plaintiff, Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI MDL No. 1827 Individual Case No. 3:10-cv-05625-SI STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Date Action Filed: December 10, 2010 19 v. 20 AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, ET AL., 21 Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP The undersigned counsel, on behalf of Plaintiff Alfred H. Siegel, As Trustee of the Circuit City Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. ("Chunghwa"), hereby stipulate and agree as follows: WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint in the above-captioned case against Defendant Chunghwa and other defendants, on December 10, 2010; 1 Stipulation of Extension of Time For Defendant Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. to Respond to Complaint; [Proposed] Order, Case No.: 3:10-CV-5625-SI; MDL 07-01827 SI Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP WHEREAS, on March 24, 2011, the Court granted Plaintiff's motion to serve Chunghwa through its U.S. counsel pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(f)(3); WHEREAS, in light of that Order, the parties agree that such service may occur via email to counsel and need consist of the Complaint only and not of the other materials required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4, Civil L.R. 3-13 or Civil L.R. 3-16, but that such agreement does not constitute a waiver of Chunghwa's objection to service of the complaint and summons through U.S. counsel; WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Chunghwa have reached an agreement, pursuant to Civil L.R. 61(a), to extend the time within which Chunghwa must move against, answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint; WHEREAS, this extension will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by the Court; and WHEREAS, the Court has previously approved stipulations between Plaintiff and certain other defendants extending those defendants' time to dismiss, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint until May 3, 2011; THEREFORE, the time within which Chunghwa must move against, answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint is extended until May 3, 2011. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Respectfully submitted, DATED: March 25, 2011 By: /s/ Rachel S. Brass_____________ Joel S. Sanders, SBN 107234 Rachel S. Brass, SBN 219301 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 555 Mission Street Suite 3000 San Francisco, California 94105-2933 Telephone: (415) 393-8200 Facsimile: (415) 393-8306 Attorneys for Defendant Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. 2 Stipulation of Extension of Time For Defendant Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. to Respond to Complaint; [Proposed] Order, Case No.: 3:10-CV-5625-SI; MDL 07-01827 SI 1 By: /s/ Kenneth S. Marks____________ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP Kenneth S. Marks (admitted pro hac vice) Susman Godfrey LLP 1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100 Houston, TX 77002-5096 (713) 651-9366 (713) 654-6666 kmarks@susmangodfrey.com Attorneys for Alfred H. Siegel, as Trustee of Circuit City Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust Attestation: The filer of this document attests that the concurrence of the other signatory thereto has been obtained. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3/28/11 ___________________________________ Date Entered _________________________________________ Honorable Judge Susan Illston 3 Stipulation of Extension of Time For Defendant Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. to Respond to Complaint; [Proposed] Order, Case No.: 3:10-CV-5625-SI; MDL 07-01827 SI 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP DECLARATION OF SERVICE I, Robin McBain, declare as follows: I am employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years and am not a party to this action; my business address is 555 Mission Street, Suite 3000, San Francisco 94105, in said County and State. On March 25, 2011, I served the within: STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER to all interested parties as follows: BY ECF (ELECTRONIC CASE FILING): I e-filed the above-detailed documents utilizing the United States District Court, Northern District of California's mandated ECF (Electronic Case Filing) service on March 25, 2011. Counsel of record are required by the Court to be registered e-filers, and as such are automatically e-served with a copy of the documents upon confirmation of e-filing. I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct, that the foregoing document was printed on recycled paper, and that this Declaration of Service was executed by me on March 25, 2011, at San Francisco, California. _____ /s:/ Robin McBain___________ Robin McBain Declaration of Service; Case No.: 3:10-CV-5625-SI; MDL 07-01827 SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?