Almy et al v. United States Department of Defense et al

Filing 102

ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/1/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 MICHAEL ALMY, JASON KNIGHT, and ANTHONY LOVERDE, No. C 10-5627 RS 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER 13 v. 14 15 16 17 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, et al., Defendants. ____________________________________/ 18 19 20 On January 22, 2013, the Court ordered: “If the case is not resolved without the Court’s 21 involvement by February 15, 2013, the Court will reset hearing dates for and resume briefing on 22 and consideration of the Motion for Protective Order, Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary 23 Judgment, and Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or, in the alternative, for Summary Judgment.” 24 On February 13, 2013, the parties filed a stipulation and joint status report stating that they 25 had exchanged drafts of a settlement agreement and were currently in the process of finalizing the 26 language of the agreement. Accordingly, the parties jointly requested, and the Court granted, an 27 extension of the February 15 deadline to March 1, 2013, so that they could complete this process. 28 NO. C 10-5627-RS ORDER 1 The parties now request an additional week-long extension. The Court has granted the 2 parties considerable latitude to settle this case, by staying these proceedings for nearly four months. 3 An extension of the stay until Friday, March 8, 2013, is granted. The Court expects that this matter 4 will have concluded by that time. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 8 Dated: 3/1/13 RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NO. C 10-5627-RS ORDER 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?