Almy et al v. United States Department of Defense et al

Filing 102

ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/1/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
MICHAEL ALMY, JASON KNIGHT, and
ANTHONY LOVERDE,

No. C 10-5627 RS

12
Plaintiffs,

ORDER

13
v.
14
15
16
17

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE, et al.,
Defendants.
____________________________________/

18
19
20

On January 22, 2013, the Court ordered: “If the case is not resolved without the Court’s

21

involvement by February 15, 2013, the Court will reset hearing dates for and resume briefing on

22

and consideration of the Motion for Protective Order, Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary

23

Judgment, and Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or, in the alternative, for Summary Judgment.”

24

On February 13, 2013, the parties filed a stipulation and joint status report stating that they

25

had exchanged drafts of a settlement agreement and were currently in the process of finalizing the

26

language of the agreement. Accordingly, the parties jointly requested, and the Court granted, an

27

extension of the February 15 deadline to March 1, 2013, so that they could complete this process.

28
NO. C 10-5627-RS
ORDER

1

The parties now request an additional week-long extension. The Court has granted the

2

parties considerable latitude to settle this case, by staying these proceedings for nearly four months.

3

An extension of the stay until Friday, March 8, 2013, is granted. The Court expects that this matter

4

will have concluded by that time.

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7
8

Dated: 3/1/13
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NO. C 10-5627-RS
ORDER

2