Almy et al v. United States Department of Defense et al

Filing 98

ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/22/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 MICHAEL ALMY, JASON KNIGHT, and ANTHONY LOVERDE, No. C 10-5627 RS 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER 13 v. 14 15 16 17 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, et al., Defendants. ____________________________________/ 18 19 20 On October 15, 2012, pursuant to stipulation by the parties, the Court entered an order 21 staying all proceedings in this case pending the completion of the parties’ attempts to achieve a 22 resolution outside this matter. See Dkt. 93. The parties were ordered to file a joint status report 23 updating the Court on their settlement attempts on November 15, 2012, and every 30 days 24 thereafter. Id. The stipulation and order stated that “all briefing and further proceedings in this 25 matter shall resume at the request of the Court . . . should the parties be unable to resolve this matter 26 in a timely manner without the Court’s involvement.” Id. Three months have passed since the stay 27 order. The joint status reports do not show much progress by the parties in resolving this case. If 28 the case is not resolved without the Court’s involvement by February 15, 2013, the Court’s will reNO. C 10-5627-RS ORDER 1 set hearing dates for and resume briefing on and consideration of the Motion for Protective Order, 2 Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, and Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or, in the 3 alternative, for Summary Judgment. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 Dated: 1/22/13 RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NO. C 10-5627-RS ORDER 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?