Almy et al v. United States Department of Defense et al
Filing
98
ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/22/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
MICHAEL ALMY, JASON KNIGHT, and
ANTHONY LOVERDE,
No. C 10-5627 RS
12
Plaintiffs,
ORDER
13
v.
14
15
16
17
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE, et al.,
Defendants.
____________________________________/
18
19
20
On October 15, 2012, pursuant to stipulation by the parties, the Court entered an order
21
staying all proceedings in this case pending the completion of the parties’ attempts to achieve a
22
resolution outside this matter. See Dkt. 93. The parties were ordered to file a joint status report
23
updating the Court on their settlement attempts on November 15, 2012, and every 30 days
24
thereafter. Id. The stipulation and order stated that “all briefing and further proceedings in this
25
matter shall resume at the request of the Court . . . should the parties be unable to resolve this matter
26
in a timely manner without the Court’s involvement.” Id. Three months have passed since the stay
27
order. The joint status reports do not show much progress by the parties in resolving this case. If
28
the case is not resolved without the Court’s involvement by February 15, 2013, the Court’s will reNO. C 10-5627-RS
ORDER
1
set hearing dates for and resume briefing on and consideration of the Motion for Protective Order,
2
Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, and Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or, in the
3
alternative, for Summary Judgment.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
Dated: 1/22/13
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NO. C 10-5627-RS
ORDER
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?