Cooper v. Jaguar Land Rover North America LLC et al
Filing
12
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge MARIA-ELENA JAMES on 11/4/11. (bjtS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
DONALD F. SETH, ESQ.
SBN 92318
2200 Range Ave., Suite 202
Santa Rosa CA 95403
Tel: (707) 545-6370
Fax: (707) 545-9770
Email: donaldfseth@gmail.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
CHARLES KEVIN COOPER
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
CHARLES KEVIN COOPER,
No. CV10-05682 MEJ
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
STIPULATION AND ORDER
FOR DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE
JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH
AMERICA, LLC,
PRESS ON REGARDLESS, INC.,
et al.
Assigned Judge: Hon. Maria-Elena James
13
14
15
16
Chief United States Magistrate Judge
Defendants.
/
17
18
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff
19
CHARLES KEVIN COOPER and all Defendants, JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH
20
AMERICA, LLC, and PRESS ON REGARDLESS, INC., through their respective counsel of
21
record, that the complaint against all Defendants, including all DOE defendants, shall be
22
dismissed with prejudice.
23
24
Dated: November 2
, 2011
LAW OFFICE OF DONALD F. SETH
25
26
27
28
By: /s/ Donald F. Seth
DONALD F. SETH
Attorney for Plaintiff
1
Dated: November 2
, 2011
BOWMAN AND BROOKE, LLP
2
3
By: \s\ Brian Takahashi - original
signature attached
BRIAN TAKAHASHI
SEAN A. RAMIA
RYAN A. MC CARTHY
Attorneys for Defendants JAGUAR
LAND ROVER NORTH AMERICA
and PRESS ON REGARDLESS, INC.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ORDER
11
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS ORDERED that the complaint is hereby
12
dismissed against all Defendants with prejudice.
13
14
November 4, 2011
Dated: ______________________, 2011
15
___________________________________
MARIA-ELENA JAMES
CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?