County of San Mateo v. CSL Limited et al

Filing 137

Order by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley denying 135 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal.(jsclc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2014)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO,

Case No. 10-cv-05686-JSC

Plaintiff,
8
v.

ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

9
10

CSL LIMITED, et al.,

Re: Dkt. No. 135

Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13

Now pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s administrative motion to file under seal

14

portions of its opposition to Defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment, and the

15

accompanying declaration and exhibits. (Dkt. No. 135.) Plaintiff’s motion seeks to file the

16

documents under seal pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(e) because the documents include information

17

that Defendants have designated as confidential. Local Rule 79-5(e)(1) provides that “[w]ithin 4

18

days of the filing of the Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, the Designating Party must file

19

a declaration as required by subsection 79-5(d)(1)(A) establishing that all of the designated

20

material is sealable.” N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 79-5(e)(1). Although the motion was filed over one

21

week ago, Defendants (i.e., the Designating Party) have failed to file their supporting declaration

22

within the four days provided by the Local Rules. The motion to file under seal is accordingly

23

DENIED and Plaintiff shall file unredacted versions of the documents in accordance with Local

24

Rule 79-5(e)(2).

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 30, 2014
______________________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
United States Magistrate Judge