County of San Mateo v. CSL Limited et al

Filing 138

Order by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley denying 116 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. (jsclc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2014)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO,

Case No. 10-cv-05686-JSC

Plaintiff,
8
v.

ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

9
10

CSL LIMITED, et al.,

Re: Dkt. No. 116

Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13

Defendants have filed an administrative motion to file under seal portions of its motion for

14

leave to file motion for partial summary judgment. (Dkt. No. 116.) Defendants’ motion seeks to

15

file the documents under seal pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(e) because the documents include

16

information that Plaintiff has designated as confidential. Local Rule 79-5(e)(1) provides that

17

“[w]ithin 4 days of the filing of the Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, the Designating

18

Party must file a declaration as required by subsection 79-5(d)(1)(A) establishing that all of the

19

designated material is sealable.” N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 79-5(e)(1). Because Plaintiff has failed to

20

file the supporting declaration as required by Rule 79-5(e)(1), the motion to file under seal is

21

accordingly DENIED. Defendants shall file unredacted versions of the documents in accordance

22

with Local Rule 79-5(e)(2).

23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 4, 2014
______________________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
United States Magistrate Judge