Yates v. Ambrosia Pizza et al

Filing 26

ORDER RESETTING CMC Case Management Statement due by 3/30/2012. Further Case Management Conference set for 4/6/2012 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/16/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2012)

Download PDF
1 4 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH, A Professional Law Corporation THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar No. 074414) 4328 Redwood Hwy, Suite 300 San Rafael, CA 94903 Telephone: 415/444-5800 Facsimile: 415/444-5805 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff CRAIG YATES 2 3 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 CRAIG YATES, an individual, 18 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) AMBROSIA PIZZA; SHOPS at ) ) MAGNOLIA LLC, a Nevada Limited ) Liability Company; SHOPS at ) MAGNOLIA II LLC, a California Limited ) ) Liability Company; and MARK DAVID ) LESLEY, an individual dba AMBROSIA ) ) PIZZA, ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) ) 19 TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES OF INTEREST: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 20 CASE NO. CV-10-5687-EMC NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT ORDER RESETTING CMC Notice is hereby given that the parties to the above-captioned matter have agreed to 21 settlement terms which fully resolve the claims herein. The parties respectfully request that all 22 matters currently on calendar be vacated. Dismissal documents will be filed with the Court no 23 later than February 29, 2012 24 IT IS SO ORDERED that the further CMC is reset from 2/24/12 to 4/6/12 at 10:30 a.m. UNIT ED __________________ Edward M. Chen U. S. District Judge NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT IT IS SO NO RT Judge Ed H ER ED ORDER R NIA S S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 28 N /s/ Thomas E. Frankovich Thomas E. Frankovich Attorneys for CRAIG YATES, an individual By: . Chen ward M FO 27 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION LI 26 Dated: February 15, 2012 A 25 F D IS T IC T O R C CV-10-5687-EM C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?