Teleconference Systems, LLC v. AT&T Corporation et al

Filing 91

ORDER GRANTING 88 Stipulation to Extend Claim Construction Deadlines. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 3/21/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2011)

Teleconference Systems, LLC v. AT&T Corporation et al

Doc. 91

1

2
3
4
5

ANTHONY G. SIMON, Mo. Bar No. 38745 (pro hac vice) TIMOTHY E. GROCHOCINSKI, Mo. Bar No. 59607 (pro hac vice) The Simon Law Firm, P.C. 800 Market Street, Suite 1700 Saint Louis, Missouri 63101 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff,

6
7
8

TELECONFERENCE SYSTEMS, LLC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION TELECONFERENCE SYSTEMS, LLC,
) ) Case No.: 3:10-cv-5740-JSW ) ) JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ) ORDER TO EXTEND CLAIM ) CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES ) ~Hon. Jeffrey S. White

9

10
11

Plaintiff, vs. AT&T CORP., et al. Defendants.

12 13 14 15

WHEREFORE Plaintiff Teleconference Systems, LLC files this Joint Stipulation for Extension of Time to extend claim construction deadlines and in support thereof states as follows:

16 17
18 19
20

WHEREFORE, on August 9,2010, the Court issued an Order in the Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Teleconference Systems, LLC, et al. matter (Case No.3 :09-cv-1550-JSW) adopting the schedule for Patent Local Rules disclosures and claim construction briefing outlined by the parties in that case in their Joint Case Management Statements in the California Actions [Case No. 3:09-cv-1550-JSW, Doc. 201]. Also, on December 22,2010, Judge Jeffrey S. White issued

21 22
23

24 25 26 27

an Order granting an extension of the claim construction deadlines [Case No. 3:09-cv-1550-JSW, Doc. 228].
I.

28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES

Case No. 3:10-cv-5740-JSW

Dockets.Justia.com

WHEREFORE, on January 18,2011, this Court issued an order in this case relating this
1

2 3 4 5

matter to Cisco Systems, Inc, v. Teleconference Systems, LLC, et al. (Case No. 3:09-cv-1550JSW) [Doc. 68]. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff s counsel requests the aforementioned extensions due to being out of the office on family vacations.

6 7 8 9

WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff requests and Defendants have consented to a one week extension of the following deadlines as outlined in the chart below:
;W, . 'liil

10
11

12 13 14 15 16

Conference regarding the terms to be construed the Court Filing of Joint Claim Construction Statement and Prehearing Statement pursuant to Pat. Exchange of expert reports on Claim Construction

March 25, 2011 March 25, 2011 April 1,2011

March 25, 2011

April I, 2011

WHEREFORE the requested extension does not affect any other deadlines scheduled in this matter.

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES that, subject to the Court's approval, the claim construction deadlines be extended as outlined in the chart above.

2.
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED) ORDER TO EXTEND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES

Case No. 3:10-cv-5740·JSW

1 2 3
4

Dated: March 18, 2011

THE SIMON LAW FIRM, P.e. By: lsi Timothy E. Grochocinski Timothy E. Grochocinski [e-mail]

5

Dated: March 18,2011

6
7

WElL, GOTSHAL & MANGES, LLP By: lsi Andrew Perito Andrew Perito [e-mail]

8

Dated: March 18, 2011
9

BAKER BOTTS, LLP
By: lsi Kurt Pankratz Kurt Pankratz [e-mail]

10
11

12

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45
13 14 15 16 17

I, Timothy E. Grochocinski, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory. In compliance with General Order 45, paragraphX.B., I hereby attest that Andrew Perito and Kurt Pankratz have concurred in this filing. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on

18 19

March 18, 2011. By:

20
21

Is/Timothy E. Grochocinski Timothy E. Grochocinski

22
23 24

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing was served on all parties of record via the Court's CM/ECF system on March 18,2011.

25
26
27

lsi Timothy E. Grochocinski Timothy E. Grochocinski

3.
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES

Case No. 3:10·cv-5740-JSW

1

2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION TELECONFERENCE SYSTEMS, LLC, Plaintiff, vs. AT&T CORP., et al. Defendants.

3
4
5

)

~ )

Case No.: 3:1O-cv-5740-JSW

6
7
8

[PROPOSED] ORDER ) ) Judge Jeffrey S. White ) ) )

9

Pursuant to the foregoing Joint Stipulation and for good cause shown, IT IS SO ORDERED that the one week extension of the claim construction deadlines as outlined below are GRANTED.

10
11

12
13

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

Parties' Conference regarding the terms to be construed by the Court Filing of Joint Claim Construction Statement and Prehearing Statement pursuant to Pat. L.R. 4-3 Exchange of expert reports on Construction Dated: March 18, 2011

March 25, 2011

April 1, 2011

March 25, 2011

April I, 2011

Jeffrey S. White U.S. District Judge

1.
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES

Case No. 3:10·cv·5740-JSW