Ordonez v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

Filing 20

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO RESPOND TO MOTIONS IN LIMINE. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 3/12/2012. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2012)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

Northern District of California

6
7

NESTOR ANTONIO ORDONEZ,
Plaintiff,

8

No. C10-5754 MEJ

v.
9

11

ORDER RE DEFENDANT’S
MOTIONS IN LIMINE
(DKT. NOS. 17 AND 18)

Defendant.
_____________________________________/

12
For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NATIONAL PASSENGER RAILROAD
CORP.,

13
14

On March 1, 2012, Defendant filed two motions in limine to exclude evidence in the

15

upcoming trial for this matter. Dkt. Nos. 17 and 18. Pursuant to the Court’s case management

16

order, Plaintiff was required to file any opposition to these motions by March 8, 2012. Dkt. No. 11.

17

Plaintiff, however, has not filed any response to Defendant’s motions. If Plaintiff wishes to oppose

18

Defendant’s motions, he is hereby ordered to file a response by Wednesday, March 14, 2012 at

19

9:00 a.m.

20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: March 12, 2012
_______________________________
Maria-Elena James
Chief United States Magistrate Judge