Mendoza v. Wilmington Finance et al

Filing 50

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL AND ORDER (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6

JOSEPH A. LEPERA (SBN 207615)
LEPERA + ASSOCIATES, PC
601 Montgomery Street Suite 830
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CATARINA MENDOZA

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

601 Montgomery Street
Suite 830
San Francisco, CA 94111

LEP ERA + A S SO CI A T ES, P C

11
12

CATARINO MENDOZA, an individual,
Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

v.
WILMINGTON FINANCE, a business entity,
form unknown; FIVE STAR INVESTMENT
AND REALTY; ACADEMY ESCROW, INC., a
business entity, form unknown; NEW
CENTURY, a business entity, form unknown;
NORTH AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY, a
business entity, form unknown; MORTGAGE
ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS,
INC., a business entity, form unknown; and
DOES 1-100, inclusive,

Case No.: 3:10-CV-05792-SC
DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)
Judge:

Hon. Samuel Conti

Complaint Filed:

December 20, 2010

Defendants.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), hereby voluntarily dismisses all claims in this action
without prejudice as to Defendants Five Star Investment and Realty, New Century, and North
1
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Catarino Mendoza v. Wilmington Finance, et al. Case No. 3:10-CV-05792-SC
PLAINTIFF
PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)

1

American Title Company.

2

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) provides, in relevant part:

3

(a) Voluntary Dismissal.

4

(1) By the Plaintiff.

5

(A) Without a Court Order. Subject to Rules 23(e), 23.1(c), 23.2, and 66 and any

6

applicable federal statute, the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order

7

by filing:

8

(i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a

9

motion for summary judgment;

summary judgment. Accordingly, this matter may be dismissed without prejudice and without

12

an Order of the Court.

13

DATED: November 21, 2011

14
15
16
17

Respectfully Submitted,
LEPERA + ASSOCIATES, PC
By: s/s Joseph A. Lepera
Joseph A. Lepera
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

18

onti

S

Judge S

RT
H

ER

24

FO

amuel C

NO

23

ED

ORDER

LI

22

O
IT IS S

A

21

RT
U
O

20

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

R NIA

19
UNIT
ED

601 Montgomery Street
Suite 830
San Francisco, CA 94111

filed a motion for

11
LEP ERA + A S SO CI A T ES, P C

10

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

25
26
27
28

2
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Catarino Mendoza v. Wilmington Finance, et al. Case No. 3:10-CV-05792-SC
PLAINTIFF
PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)