Reynolds v. Magor et al

Filing 16

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 11/15/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FERDINAND REYNOLDS, Plaintiff, 12 13 vs. 14 ARTHUR F. MAJOR, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 10-05917 CRB (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL 17 18 Plaintiff, a California prisoner currently incarcerated at Salinas Valley State Prison 19 (SVSP), filed the instant pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 alleging various 20 violations of his federal rights. On April 27, 2011, the Court (Fogel, J.) dismissed the 21 complaint with partial leave to amend to allege a retaliation claim against Defendant L. 22 Stepp, if possible. The Court made clear that failure to amend within 30 days would 23 result in "the dismissal without prejudice of this action without further notice to Plaintiff." 24 Docket #7 at 7. 25 Plaintiff was thereafter granted two extensions of time to file an amended 26 complaint, the last deadline being August 10, 2011. But rather than file an amended 27 complaint by August 10, 2011, Plaintiff filed a letter on August 5, 2011 alleging that 28 during a review of his legal property he had discovered that prison officials had destroyed 1 1 some of his documents, including several eyewitness declarations regarding the incidents 2 which are the subject of this action. In the interest of justice, Plaintiff was granted a final 3 extension of time to November 8, 2011 to file an amended complaint. Docket #13. 4 Plaintiff's final deadline has passed and he still has not filed an amended 5 complaint. Nor has he sought a further extension of time, let alone shown good cause for 6 one. Rather, he has filed a declaration in which he again states that prison officials 7 destroyed several eyewitness declarations regarding the incidents which are the subject of 8 this action. Docket #14. Plaintiff's action is DISMISSED without prejudice. 9 The clerk is instructed to enter judgment in accordance with this order and to close 10 the file. 11 ORDERED. 12 DATED: Nov. 15, 2011 CHARLES R. BREYER United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 G:\PRO-SE\CRB\CR.10\Reynolds, F.10-5917.dismissal.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?